Luszczak Joanna, Olszowska Maria, Drapisz Sylwia, Plazak Wojciech, Kaznica-Wiatr Magdalena, Karch Izabela, Podolec Piotr
Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Pradnicka 80, 31-202 Krakow, Poland.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013 Dec 27;11:45. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-11-45.
Early detection of left ventricle (LV) systolic dysfunction is essential for management of patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Two- dimensional speckle tracking derived global longitudinal peak strain (GLPS) is more sensitive than ejection fraction (EF) but requires good image quality and is not easily accessible. The aim of the study was to compare GLPS with traditional echocardiographic parameter- mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) in AS.
In consecutive patients with moderate to severe AS and LV ejection fraction ≥ 50% standard echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography were performed. Mitral annular plane systolic excursion and global longitudinal peak strain were obtained from apical echocardiographic views.
A total of 82 patients were examined, median age was 68 (60-78), 56% of them were men. There was a positive correlation between aortic valve area index (AVAI) and: MAPSE (r = 0.334, p = 0.002), MAPSE indexed for body surface area- MAPSEI (r = 0.349, p = 0.001) and GLPS (r = 0.342, p = 0.002) but not EF (r = 0.031, p = 0.782). A positive correlation was found between GLPS and MAPSE (r = 0.558, p < 0.001) and between GLPS and MAPSEI (r = 0.543, p < 0.001). All above parameters were significantly lower in symptomatic patients compared to asymptomatic subjects (GLPS: -13.82 ± 3.56 vs. -16.39 ± 3.16%, p = 0.002, MAPSE: 10.49 ± 1.91 vs. 11.95 ± 1.82 mm, p = 0.001 and MAPSEI: 5.66 (4.83-6.6) vs. 6.46 ± 0.97 mm/m2, p = 0.005).
Despite the development of the modern echocardiographic techniques, mitral annular plane systolic excursion can still be used as a sensitive tool to detect early longitudinal LV systolic dysfunction.
早期发现左心室(LV)收缩功能障碍对于主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的管理至关重要。二维斑点追踪得出的整体纵向峰值应变(GLPS)比射血分数(EF)更敏感,但需要良好的图像质量且不易获得。本研究的目的是在AS患者中比较GLPS与传统超声心动图参数——二尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(MAPSE)。
对连续的中重度AS且左心室射血分数≥50%的患者进行标准超声心动图和二维斑点追踪超声心动图检查。从心尖超声心动图视图中获取二尖瓣环平面收缩期位移和整体纵向峰值应变。
共检查了82例患者,中位年龄为68岁(60 - 78岁),其中56%为男性。主动脉瓣面积指数(AVAI)与以下指标呈正相关:MAPSE(r = 0.334,p = 0.002)、体表面积校正的MAPSE——MAPSEI(r = 0.349,p = 0.001)和GLPS(r = 0.342,p = 0.002),但与EF无关(r = 0.031,p = 0.782)。GLPS与MAPSE(r = 0.558,p < 0.001)以及GLPS与MAPSEI(r = 0.543,p < 0.001)之间呈正相关。与无症状受试者相比,有症状患者的所有上述参数均显著降低(GLPS:-13.82±3.56 vs. -16.39±3.16%,p = 0.002;MAPSE:10.49±1.91 vs. 11.95±1.82 mm,p = 0.001;MAPSEI:5.66(4.83 - 6.6)vs. 6.46±0.97 mm/m²,p = 0.005)。
尽管现代超声心动图技术不断发展,但二尖瓣环平面收缩期位移仍可作为检测左心室早期纵向收缩功能障碍的敏感工具。