Carter Alix J E, Overton Jerry, Terashima Mikiko, Cone David C
Emergency Health Services - Nova Scotia, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University School of Medicine, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Richmond Ambulance Authority, Richmond, Virginia.
J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;47(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.109. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
"Offload delay" occurs when the transfer of care from paramedics to the emergency department (ED) is prolonged. Accurately measuring the delivery interval or "offload" is important, because it represents the time patients are waiting for definitive care. Because recording this interval presents a significant challenge, most emergency medical services systems only measure the complete at-hospital time or "turnaround interval," and most offload delay research and policy is based on this proxy.
This study sought to test the validity of using the turnaround interval as a surrogate for the delivery interval.
This observational study examined levels of correspondence, or correlation, between delivery interval and turnaround interval, to assess whether turnaround is a reasonable surrogate for delivery. Delivery and turnaround intervals were logged by Richmond Ambulance Authority (RAA) in Richmond, Virginia, United States from April 1 to December 31, 2008. A total of 1732 ambulance runs from RAA were included.
Pearson's correlation analysis showed a good correlation between turnaround and actual offload time (delivery), with a coefficient (r) of 0.753. A post hoc analysis explored patterns in the relationship, which is quite complex.
The results show that the correlation between the delivery and turnaround intervals is good. However, there remains much to be learned about the at-hospital time intervals and how to use these data to make decisions that will improve resource utilization and patient care. Efforts to establish a method to accurately record the delivery interval and to understand the at-hospital portion of the ambulance response are necessary.
当护理人员向急诊科(ED)的护理交接时间延长时,就会出现“卸载延迟”。准确测量运送间隔或“卸载”时间很重要,因为它代表了患者等待确定性治疗的时间。由于记录这个间隔存在重大挑战,大多数紧急医疗服务系统只测量在院总时间或“周转间隔”,并且大多数卸载延迟研究和政策都是基于这个替代指标。
本研究旨在检验使用周转间隔作为运送间隔替代指标的有效性。
这项观察性研究检查了运送间隔和周转间隔之间的对应程度或相关性,以评估周转间隔是否是运送间隔的合理替代指标。美国弗吉尼亚州里士满市的里士满救护车管理局(RAA)在2008年4月1日至12月31日期间记录了运送间隔和周转间隔。共纳入了RAA的1732次救护车出诊。
Pearson相关性分析显示周转间隔与实际卸载时间(运送间隔)之间存在良好的相关性,系数(r)为0.753。事后分析探讨了这种关系中的模式,该模式相当复杂。
结果表明运送间隔和周转间隔之间的相关性良好。然而,关于在院时间间隔以及如何利用这些数据做出能改善资源利用和患者护理的决策,仍有很多需要了解的地方。必须努力建立一种准确记录运送间隔的方法,并了解救护车出诊过程中的在院部分情况。