Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Physical Therapy, Keller Army Community Hospital, West Point, New York, and Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy Fellowship, Regis University, Denver, Colorado.
Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Sports Health. 2013 Jan;5(1):17-21. doi: 10.1177/1941738112456280.
It is common clinical practice to assess muscle strength during examination of patients following shoulder injury or surgery. Strength comparisons are often made between the patient's injured and uninjured shoulders, with the uninjured side used as a reference without regard to upper extremity dominance. Despite the importance of strength measurements, little is known about expected normal baselines of the uninjured shoulder. The purpose of this study was to report normative values for isometric shoulder strength for physically active college-age men and women without history of shoulder injury.
University students-546 males (18.8 ± 1.0 years, 75.3 ± 12.2 kg) and 73 females (18.7 ± 0.9 years, 62.6 ± 7.0 kg)-underwent thorough shoulder evaluations by an orthopaedic surgeon and completed bilateral isometric strength measurements with a handheld dynamometer. Variables measured included internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, supine internal rotation and external rotation at 45°, and lower trapezius in prone flexion.
Significant differences were found between the dominant and nondominant shoulder for internal rotation, internal rotation at 45°, abduction, and prone flexion in males and in internal rotation at 45° and prone flexion for females (P ≤ 0.01).
在检查肩部受伤或手术后的患者时,评估肌肉力量是常见的临床实践。通常将患者受伤和未受伤的肩膀进行力量比较,而不考虑上肢优势,将未受伤的一侧用作参考。尽管力量测量很重要,但对于未受伤肩部的预期正常基线知之甚少。本研究的目的是报告无肩部受伤史的身体活跃的大学生年龄段男性和女性的等长肩部力量的正常值。
通过骨科医生对大学生-546 名男性(18.8 ± 1.0 岁,75.3 ± 12.2 公斤)和 73 名女性(18.7 ± 0.9 岁,62.6 ± 7.0 公斤)进行全面的肩部评估,并使用手持测力计完成双侧等长力量测量。测量的变量包括内旋、外旋、外展、仰卧内旋和外旋 45°,以及俯身在低位斜方肌屈曲。
在男性中,主导肩和非主导肩的内旋、45°内旋、外展和俯身在低位斜方肌屈曲以及女性的 45°内旋和俯身在低位斜方肌屈曲方面存在显著差异(P ≤ 0.01)。