McConnell Yarrow J, Mack Lloyd A, Gui Xianyong, Carr Norman J, Sideris Lucas, Temple Walley J, Dubé Pierre, Chandrakumaran Kandiah, Moran Brendan J, Cecil Tom D
Division of Surgical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada,
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;21(6):1975-82. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3469-5. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
The debate remains whether appendiceal goblet cell cancers behave as classical carcinoid or adenocarcinoma. Treatment options are unclear and reports of outcomes are scarce. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS+HIPEC) is considered optimal treatment for peritoneal involvement of other epithelial appendiceal tumors.
Prospective cohorts of patients treated for advanced appendiceal tumors from three peritoneal malignancy centres were collected (1994-2011). All patients underwent complete CRS+HIPEC, when possible, or tumor debulking. Demographic and outcome data for patients with goblet cell cancers were compared to patients with low- or high-grade epithelial appendiceal tumors treated during the same time period.
Details on 45 goblet cell cancer patients were compared to 708 patients with epithelial appendix lesions. In the goblet cell group, 57.8 % were female, median age was 53 years, median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 24, and CRS+HIPEC was achieved in 71.1 %. These details were similar in patients with low- or high-grade epithelial tumors. Lymph nodes were involved in 52 % of goblet cell patients, similar to rates in high-grade cancers, but significantly higher than in low-grade lesions (6.4 %; p < 0.001). At 3 years, overall survival (OS) was 63.4 % for goblet cell patients, intermediate between that for high-grade (40.4-52.2 %) and low-grade (80.6 %) tumors. On multivariate analysis, tumor histology, PCI, and achievement of CRS+HIPEC were independently associated with OS.
This data supports the concept that appendiceal goblet cell cancers behave more as high-grade adenocarcinomas than as low-grade lesions. These patients have reasonable long-term survival when treated using CRS+HIPEC, and this strategy should be considered.
关于阑尾杯状细胞癌的生物学行为表现为典型类癌还是腺癌仍存在争议。治疗方案尚不明确,且预后报告较少。细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗(CRS+HIPEC)被认为是治疗其他阑尾上皮性肿瘤腹膜转移的最佳方法。
收集了三个腹膜恶性肿瘤中心治疗晚期阑尾肿瘤患者的前瞻性队列(1994年至2011年)。所有患者尽可能接受了完整的CRS+HIPEC或肿瘤减瘤手术。将杯状细胞癌患者的人口统计学和预后数据与同期治疗的低级别或高级别阑尾上皮性肿瘤患者进行比较。
45例杯状细胞癌患者的详细情况与708例阑尾上皮病变患者进行了比较。在杯状细胞组中,57.8%为女性,中位年龄为53岁,中位腹膜癌指数(PCI)为24,71.1%的患者接受了CRS+HIPEC。低级别或高级别上皮性肿瘤患者的这些情况与之相似。52%的杯状细胞癌患者有淋巴结转移,与高级别癌症的发生率相似,但显著高于低级别病变(6.4%;p<0.001)。3年时,杯状细胞癌患者的总生存率(OS)为63.4%,介于高级别(40.4%-52.2%)和低级别(80.6%)肿瘤之间。多因素分析显示,肿瘤组织学、PCI和CRS+HIPEC的实施与OS独立相关。
该数据支持阑尾杯状细胞癌的生物学行为更倾向于高级别腺癌而非低级别病变这一概念。这些患者采用CRS+HIPEC治疗有合理的长期生存率,应考虑采用该策略。