Suppr超能文献

中风幸存者对中风的认知存在性别差异。

Gender differences in stroke recognition among stroke survivors.

机构信息

Kendrea L. Focht, CScD, is a Doctoral Student in the Department of Health Sciences & Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. Alison M. Gogue, MS, is a Doctoral Student in the Department of Health Sciences & Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. Brandi M. White, MPH, is a Doctoral Student in the Department of Health Sciences & Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC. Questions or comments about this article may be directed to Charles Ellis, PhD, at

出版信息

J Neurosci Nurs. 2014 Feb;46(1):18-22; quiz 22, E1-2. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000026.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that gender differences exist in the recognition of stroke warning signs. Poor recognition of stroke warning signs has been attributed to negative treatment-seeking behaviors, which can result in poor outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine gender differences in the recognition of traditional early warning signs of stroke and first action to initiate treatment in a sample of stroke survivors.

METHODS

We collected survey data to examine recognition of traditional stroke warning signs and appropriate first action to initiate treatment along with demographic (age, stroke age, education, usual source of care, and insurance) and clinical (health literacy and stroke knowledge) variables.

RESULTS

Seventy-one stroke survivors participated in this pilot study. Women in the sample were significantly older than men at time of stroke (62 years old vs. 55 years old; p < .05). The two groups did not differ in clinical variables. Recognition of traditional individual stroke warning signs ranged from approximately 60% to 90%. There were no significant gender differences in the recognition of individual warning signs. Women were more likely to recognize all five traditional warning signs compared with men (67% vs. 42%; p = .04). Similarly, 58% of female participants recognized all five traditional stroke warning signs collectively and would call 9-1-1 as a first action compared with only 29% of men (p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Although women recognized traditional stroke warning signs more often than men, educational programs should emphasize both traditional and nontraditional stroke warning signs among women and address these differences with their healthcare providers.

摘要

背景

研究表明,在识别中风警告信号方面存在性别差异。对中风警告信号识别能力差归因于消极的治疗寻求行为,这可能导致不良结局。

目的

本研究旨在检查中风幸存者样本中识别传统中风预警信号和启动治疗的首要行动方面的性别差异。

方法

我们收集了调查数据,以检查对传统中风预警信号的识别以及启动治疗的适当首要行动,同时还收集了人口统计学(年龄、中风年龄、教育程度、常规护理来源和保险)和临床(健康素养和中风知识)变量。

结果

71 名中风幸存者参与了这项试点研究。中风时女性的年龄明显大于男性(62 岁 vs. 55 岁;p <.05)。两组在临床变量方面没有差异。对传统个体中风预警信号的识别率从约 60%到 90%不等。在识别个体预警信号方面,男女之间没有显著的性别差异。与男性相比,女性更有可能识别出所有五个传统的预警信号(67% vs. 42%;p =.04)。同样,58%的女性参与者集体识别出所有五个传统的中风预警信号,并会拨打 9-1-1 作为首要行动,而只有 29%的男性会这样做(p =.02)。

结论

尽管女性比男性更经常识别传统的中风警告信号,但教育计划应强调女性的传统和非传统中风警告信号,并与她们的医疗保健提供者一起解决这些差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验