Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chicago, Illinois.
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):248-254. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000096.
To estimate the association between obstetric forceps volume and severe perineal lacerations or adverse neonatal outcomes.
This is a retrospective cohort of forceps deliveries performed at a tertiary care hospital. Obstetricians were grouped by quartile of forceps volume over the study time period. Severe (third- or fourth-degree) perineal lacerations and adverse neonatal outcomes were compared across quartiles. Individual patient characteristics were controlled for using multilevel multivariable analysis. This study had 90% power to detect a twofold difference in severe perineal lacerations between the first and fourth quartiles. Additional analyses were performed using physician years in practice or year of residency of the involved resident physicians.
One hundred eighteen attending physicians (2,369 forceps deliveries) were included. The median (interquartile range) annual number of forceps per quartile was 1.3 (1.0-1.8), 3.8 (3.0-4.3), 6.3 (5.5-6.8), and 11.5 (9.8-17.3). The frequency of severe perineal lacerations from lowest to highest quartile was 29.9%, 27.5%, 33.3%, and 36.9% (P=.013). After adjusting for confounders, the relationship between volume quartile and severe perineal lacerations became nonsignificant. Although not powered to this outcome, the frequency of composite adverse neonatal outcome was not associated with volume quartile in either bivariate or multivariable analysis. Similarly, neither physician years of practice nor resident year was associated with severe perineal laceration. However, more experience as a resident was associated with a reduced odds of composite adverse neonatal outcomes.
After controlling for patient factors, neither attending forceps volume nor physician years in practice was associated with severe perineal lacerations or composite neonatal injury.
II.
评估产钳使用量与严重会阴裂伤或不良新生儿结局之间的关系。
这是一项在一家三级保健医院进行的产钳分娩回顾性队列研究。根据研究期间产钳使用量的四分位数,将产科医生分为四组。比较四分位组之间的严重(三度或四度)会阴裂伤和不良新生儿结局。使用多层次多变量分析控制个体患者特征。本研究有 90%的效能检测第一四分位数和第四四分位数之间严重会阴裂伤的两倍差异。还使用参与住院医师的执业年数或住院医师的住院年数进行了额外的分析。
共纳入 118 名主治医生(2369 例产钳分娩)。四分位数的中位(四分位间距)每年产钳数量分别为 1.3(1.0-1.8)、3.8(3.0-4.3)、6.3(5.5-6.8)和 11.5(9.8-17.3)。会阴裂伤严重程度从低到高的四分位数频率分别为 29.9%、27.5%、33.3%和 36.9%(P=.013)。在调整混杂因素后,产钳使用量四分位数与严重会阴裂伤之间的关系变得无统计学意义。尽管没有针对该结局进行分析,但在单变量或多变量分析中,复合不良新生儿结局的频率与体积四分位数均无关联。同样,执业年数或住院年数与严重会阴裂伤均无关联。然而,住院医师的经验越丰富,复合不良新生儿结局的可能性就越低。
在控制患者因素后,主治医生使用产钳的数量或执业年数均与严重会阴裂伤或新生儿复合损伤无关。
II 级。