Alt Jeremiah A, Mace Jess C, Buniel Maria C F, Soler Zachary M, Smith Timothy L
Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Laryngoscope. 2014 Jul;124(7):E259-66. doi: 10.1002/lary.24587. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Associations between olfactory function to quality-of-life (QOL) and disease severity in patients with rhinosinusitis is poorly understood. We sought to evaluate and compare olfactory function between subgroups of patients with rhinosinusitis using the Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT).
Cross-sectional evaluation of a multicenter cohort.
Patients with recurrent acute sinusitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyposis were prospectively enrolled from three academic tertiary care sites. Each subject completed the B-SIT, in addition to measures of disease-specific QOL. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and clinical measures of disease severity were compared between patients with normal (BSIT≥9) and abnormal (BSIT<9) olfaction scores. Regression modeling was used to identify potential risk factors associated with olfactory impairment.
Patients with rhinosinusitis (n=445) were found to suffer olfactory dysfunction as measured by the B-SIT (28.3%). Subgroups of rhinosinusitis differed in the degree of olfactory dysfunction reported. Worse disease severity, measured by computed tomography and nasal endoscopy, correlated to worse olfaction. Olfactory scores did not consistently correlate with the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index or Sinonasal Outcome Test scores. Regression models demonstrated nasal polyposis was the strongest predictor of olfactory dysfunction. Recalcitrant disease and aspirin intolerance were strongly predictive of worse olfactory function.
Olfactory dysfunction is a complex, multifactorial process found to be differentially expressed within subgroups of rhinosinusitis. Olfaction was associated with disease severity as measured by imaging and endoscopy, with only weak associations to disease-specific QOL measures.
2b.
目的/假设:鼻窦炎患者嗅觉功能与生活质量(QOL)及疾病严重程度之间的关联尚不清楚。我们试图使用简易嗅觉识别测试(B-SIT)评估和比较鼻窦炎患者亚组之间的嗅觉功能。
对多中心队列进行横断面评估。
从三个学术三级医疗中心前瞻性招募复发性急性鼻窦炎和慢性鼻窦炎伴或不伴鼻息肉的患者。除了疾病特异性生活质量测量外,每个受试者还完成了B-SIT。比较嗅觉评分正常(BSIT≥9)和异常(BSIT<9)的患者之间的患者人口统计学、合并症和疾病严重程度的临床测量。使用回归模型确定与嗅觉障碍相关的潜在风险因素。
通过B-SIT测量发现鼻窦炎患者(n=445)存在嗅觉功能障碍(28.3%)。报告的鼻窦炎亚组在嗅觉功能障碍程度上有所不同。通过计算机断层扫描和鼻内镜检查测量的更严重的疾病严重程度与更差的嗅觉相关。嗅觉评分与鼻窦炎残疾指数或鼻窦结局测试评分并不始终相关。回归模型表明鼻息肉是嗅觉功能障碍的最强预测因素。难治性疾病和阿司匹林不耐受强烈预测更差的嗅觉功能。
嗅觉功能障碍是一个复杂的多因素过程,在鼻窦炎亚组中发现其有差异表达。嗅觉与通过影像学和内镜检查测量的疾病严重程度相关,与疾病特异性生活质量测量仅有微弱关联。
2b。