Suppr超能文献

德谷胰岛素、双相门冬胰岛素和门冬胰岛素在2型糖尿病患者中的临床经验:A1chieve研究海得拉巴队列的结果。

Clinical experience with insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Results from the Hyderabad cohort of the A1chieve study.

作者信息

Santosh R, Mehrotra Ravi, Sastry N G

机构信息

Magna clinics for obesity diabetes and endocrinology, Hyderabad, India.

Apollo Hospital, Hyderabad, India.

出版信息

Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Nov;17(Suppl 2):S547-51. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.122130.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The A1chieve, a multicentric (28 countries), 24-week, non-interventional study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with T2DM (n = 66,726) in routine clinical care across four continents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was collected at baseline, at 12 weeks and at 24 weeks. This short communication presents the results for patients enrolled from Hyderabad, India.

RESULTS

A total of 1249 patients were enrolled in the study. Four different insulin analogue regimens were used in the study. Patients had started on or were switched to biphasic insulin aspart (n = 893), insulin detemir (n = 158), insulin aspart (n = 124), basal insulin plus insulin aspart (n = 19) and other insulin combinations (n = 54). At baseline glycaemic control was poor for both insulin naïve (mean HbA1c: 9.0%) and insulin user (mean HbA1c: 9.5%) groups. After 24 weeks of treatment, both the groups showed improvement in HbA1c (insulin naïve: -0.9%, insulin users: -1.1%). SADRs including major hypoglycaemic events or episodes did not occur in any of the study patients.

CONCLUSION

Starting or switching to insulin analogues was associated with improvement in glycaemic control with a low rate of hypoglycaemia.

摘要

背景

A1chieve研究是一项多中心(28个国家)、为期24周的非干预性研究,评估了地特胰岛素、双相门冬胰岛素和门冬胰岛素在四大洲接受常规临床护理的2型糖尿病患者(n = 66,726)中的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

在基线、12周和24周时收集数据。本简短通讯展示了来自印度海得拉巴的研究患者的结果。

结果

共有1249名患者参与了该研究。研究中使用了四种不同的胰岛素类似物治疗方案。患者开始使用或换用了双相门冬胰岛素(n = 893)、地特胰岛素(n = 158)、门冬胰岛素(n = 124)、基础胰岛素加门冬胰岛素(n = 19)以及其他胰岛素组合(n = 54)。在基线时,初治胰岛素患者(平均糖化血红蛋白:9.0%)和胰岛素使用者(平均糖化血红蛋白:9.5%)的血糖控制均较差。治疗24周后,两组患者的糖化血红蛋白均有所改善(初治胰岛素患者:-0.9%,胰岛素使用者:-1.1%)。在任何研究患者中均未发生包括严重低血糖事件或发作在内的严重不良药物反应。

结论

开始使用或换用胰岛素类似物与血糖控制改善及低血糖发生率低相关。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Public health: India's diabetes time bomb.
Nature. 2012 May 17;485(7398):S14-6. doi: 10.1038/485s14a.
3
Insulin analogues.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 13;352(2):174-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra040832.
4
Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.
Diabetes Care. 2004 May;27(5):1047-53. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047.
5
When oral agents fail: practical barriers to starting insulin.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002 Sep;26 Suppl 3:S18-24. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802173.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验