The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1HH, UK.
Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK.
Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Feb 6;94(2):176-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
We have investigated the evidence for positive selection in samples of African, European, and East Asian ancestry at 65 loci associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes (T2D) previously identified through genome-wide association studies. Selection early in human evolutionary history is predicted to lead to ancestral risk alleles shared between populations, whereas late selection would result in population-specific signals at derived risk alleles. By using a wide variety of tests based on the site frequency spectrum, haplotype structure, and population differentiation, we found no global signal of enrichment for positive selection when we considered all T2D risk loci collectively. However, in a locus-by-locus analysis, we found nominal evidence for positive selection at 14 of the loci. Selection favored the protective and risk alleles in similar proportions, rather than the risk alleles specifically as predicted by the thrifty gene hypothesis, and may not be related to influence on diabetes. Overall, we conclude that past positive selection has not been a powerful influence driving the prevalence of T2D risk alleles.
我们研究了先前通过全基因组关联研究确定的与 2 型糖尿病(T2D)易感性相关的 65 个位点在非洲、欧洲和东亚血统样本中的阳性选择证据。人类进化早期的选择预计会导致人群之间共享的祖先风险等位基因,而晚期选择则会导致衍生风险等位基因的群体特异性信号。通过使用基于位点频率谱、单倍型结构和群体分化的各种测试,当我们综合考虑所有 T2D 风险位点时,我们没有发现阳性选择的富集全局信号。然而,在逐个基因座的分析中,我们发现 14 个基因座存在阳性选择的名义证据。选择以相似的比例有利于保护和风险等位基因,而不是像节俭基因假说所预测的那样专门有利于风险等位基因,并且可能与对糖尿病的影响无关。总的来说,我们得出结论,过去的阳性选择并不是驱动 T2D 风险等位基因流行的强大影响因素。