Department of Pediatric Neurology, Central Military Hospital, Bogota, Colombia.
Genetics Institute National University of Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.
Pediatr Neurol. 2014 Mar;50(3):250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
A cause cannot be determined in 30% to 50% of patients with intellectual disability. Determining the etiology of intellectual disability is important and useful for pediatric neurologists, geneticists, pediatricians, and patients' families because it allows assessment of recurrence risk, appropriate genetic counseling, and focus on treatment options and prognosis. This study aims to determine the prevalence, origin, and characterization of subtelomeric rearrangements through the Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification method in pediatric patients with idiopathic intellectual disability.
A cross-sectional descriptive study was undertaken with patients seen in consultation at the neuropediatrics or genetic service of the Central Military Hospital, the Mercy' Hospital, or the Genetics Institute National University of Colombia. Patients were diagnosed with idiopathic intellectual disability between December 2010 and September 2011 and underwent a complete medical history, physical examination, and assessment to rule out other etiologies of intellectual disability. Then we applied the genetic test of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification to each patient's sample of peripheral blood to determine subtelomeric rearrangements.
We studied a group of 119 patients with idiopathic intellectual disability; Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification showed subtelomeric rearrangements in five. In the group with subtelomeric rearrangements, the most frequent results were de novo rearrangements (80%), deletion type (60%), moderate and severe intellectual disability (80%), minor phenotypic abnormalities (80%), and family history of neurological disorders (80%). No dependence relationship was observed between subtelomeric rearrangements and family history of neurological disorders, family history of intellectual disability, severity of intellectual disability, phenotypic abnormalities, and consanguinity.
This study determined a prevalence of subtelomeric rearrangements of 4.2% in a group of Colombian pediatric patients with idiopathic intellectual disability using the genetic test Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification.
30%至 50%的智力障碍患者无法确定病因。对于儿科神经学家、遗传学家、儿科医生和患者家属而言,确定智力障碍的病因非常重要且有益,因为这可以评估复发风险、进行适当的遗传咨询,并关注治疗选择和预后。本研究旨在通过多重连接依赖探针扩增(MLPA)方法确定儿科特发性智力障碍患者的亚端粒重排的患病率、来源和特征。
采用横断面描述性研究方法,对 2010 年 12 月至 2011 年 9 月期间在哥伦比亚中央军医院、仁慈医院神经科或遗传科就诊的特发性智力障碍患者进行研究。患者被诊断为特发性智力障碍,并接受了完整的病史、体格检查和评估,以排除其他智力障碍病因。然后,我们对每位患者的外周血样本进行 MLPA 遗传检测,以确定亚端粒重排。
我们研究了 119 例特发性智力障碍患者,MLPA 显示有 5 例存在亚端粒重排。在亚端粒重排组中,最常见的结果是新生重排(80%)、缺失型(60%)、中重度智力障碍(80%)、轻度表型异常(80%)和神经发育障碍家族史(80%)。未观察到亚端粒重排与神经发育障碍家族史、智力障碍家族史、智力障碍严重程度、表型异常和近亲结婚之间存在依赖关系。
本研究采用 MLPA 遗传检测方法,在一组哥伦比亚儿科特发性智力障碍患者中确定了 4.2%的亚端粒重排患病率。