全髋关节置换术中髋臼和股骨假体旋转角度的计算机断层扫描测量
Computed tomographic measurement of acetabular and femoral component version in total hip arthroplasty.
作者信息
Fujishiro Takaaki, Hayashi Shinya, Kanzaki Noriyuki, Hashimoto Shingo, Kurosaka Masahiro, Kanno Taiki, Masuda Takeshi
机构信息
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho Chuo-Ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan,
出版信息
Int Orthop. 2014 May;38(5):941-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2264-z. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
Abstract
PURPOSE
The purposes of the present study were (1) to investigate the variation and accuracy of both acetabular and femoral component version on the axial computed tomographic (CT) images, and (2) to better define the associations between the components version and clinical factors.
METHODS
We investigated acetabular and femoral component orientation in 1,411 primary total hip arthroplasties that had been performed without computer-assisted navigation. Version of the acetabular and femoral components was measured on the axial CT images.
RESULTS
The component version was significantly greater than the native version in both acetabular and femoral version. There was a significant correlation between the stem and native femoral versions, but not between the acetabular component and native acetabular versions.
CONCLUSION
This study identifies several features that might help analyse the effect of pre-operative native acetabular and femoral version on the variation of component alignment.
摘要
目的
本研究的目的是：（1）在轴向计算机断层扫描（CT）图像上研究髋臼和股骨假体部件的版本差异及准确性；（2）更好地明确部件版本与临床因素之间的关联。
方法
我们调查了1411例未采用计算机辅助导航进行的初次全髋关节置换术中髋臼和股骨假体部件的方向。在轴向CT图像上测量髋臼和股骨假体部件的版本。
结果
髋臼和股骨版本的假体部件版本均显著大于自然版本。假体柄与自然股骨版本之间存在显著相关性，但髋臼部件与自然髋臼版本之间不存在显著相关性。
结论
本研究确定了几个特征，可能有助于分析术前自然髋臼和股骨版本对假体部件对线变化的影响。
相似文献
1
Computed tomographic measurement of acetabular and femoral component version in total hip arthroplasty.
Int Orthop. 2014 May;38(5):941-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2264-z. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
2
Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 20;95(22):e172. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01014.
3
Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Nov;105(7):1311-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
Three-dimensional in vivo difference between native acetabular version and acetabular component version influences iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.
Int Orthop. 2016 Sep;40(9):1807-12. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3055-5. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
5
Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Aug;21(5):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.11.008.
6
Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Sep 20;17:399. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1255-9.
7
Evaluation of Native Femoral Neck Version and Final Stem Version Variability in Patients With Osteoarthritis Undergoing Robotically Implanted Total Hip Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
8
Component Position and Metal Ion Levels in Computer-Navigated Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.028. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
Does acetabular retroversion affect range of motion after total hip arthroplasty?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):218-24. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1482-6. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
10
The relationship between the angle of version and rate of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal resurfacings: a prospective, CT-based study.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Mar;93(3):315-20. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25545.
引用本文的文献
1
Planning Accuracy and Stem Offset Assessment in Digital Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Planning in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 31;13(21):6566. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216566.
2
Assessing the Reliability of Postoperative Cross-Table Radiographs Compared to CT Scans for Measuring Acetabular Anteversion Angle Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68575. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68575. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Polyethylene liner dissociation in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective case-control study on a single implant design.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Aug 14;25(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00785-z.
4
Prospective comparative evaluation of intraoperative joint stability and component placement between posterior approach to hip and its quadriceps coxae sparing modification for primary hip arthroplasty.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 Feb 6;49:102363. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102363. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Cemented or uncemented fixation: Which allows a more acceptable prosthetic femoral version in total hip arthroplasty?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 9;18(1):948. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04331-1.
6
The variability of CT scan protocols for total hip arthroplasty: a call for harmonisation.
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Nov 1;8(11):809-817. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0141.
7
A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty between the Direct Lateral Approach and Posterior Lateral Approach with EOS 2D/3D X-Ray Imaging System.
Orthop Surg. 2023 May;15(5):1312-1324. doi: 10.1111/os.13726. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
8
Effectiveness and Accuracy of a Patient-Specific Instrumentation System for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):878-887. doi: 10.1111/os.13665. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
9
Accuracy of a Three-Dimensional (3D)-Printed Patient-Specific (PS) Femoral Osteotomy Guide: A Computed Tomography (CT) Study.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Nov 8;9(11):667. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9110667.
10
Optimal combined anteversion range for obtaining a wider range of motion without prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a three-dimensional analysis study.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 10;17(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03112-6.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluation of the accuracy of femoral component orientation by the CT-based fluoro-matched navigation system.
Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):1063-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1852-2. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
2
Does CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-on-ceramic THA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3054-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2378-4.
3
Components anteversion in primary cementless THA using straight stem and hemispherical cup: a prospective study in 91 hips using CT-scan measurements.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Oct;97(6):615-21. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.02.014. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
4
Increased anteversion of press-fit femoral stems compared with anatomic femur.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):477-81. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1993-9.
5
Multiinstitutional epidemiological study regarding osteoarthritis of the hip in Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Sep;15(5):626-31. doi: 10.1007/s00776-010-1507-8. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
6
Stem torsion in total hip replacement.
Acta Orthop. 2010 Oct;81(5):579-82. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.524596.
7
A comparison of surgeon estimation and computed tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Nov;91(11):2598-604. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01225.
8
Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Jul;127(5):375-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0294-y. Epub 2007 Feb 13.
9
Computed tomography measurement of the accuracy of component version in total hip arthroplasty.
J Arthroplasty. 2006 Aug;21(5):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.11.008.
10
Computed tomography analysis of acetabular anteversion and abduction.
Skeletal Radiol. 2006 Jun;35(6):385-9. doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0086-4. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
Zotero 插件