Carosi Alessandra, Ingrosso Gianluca, Ponti Elisabetta, Tolu Barbara, Murgia Alessandra, di Cristino Daniela, Santoni Riccardo
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Molecular Imaging, Interventional Radiology and Radiotherapy, Tor Vergata University General Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Molecular Imaging, Interventional Radiology and Radiotherapy, Tor Vergata University General Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Med Dosim. 2014 Summer;39(2):180-4. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.12.006. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the dosimetric effect of Elekta Beam Modulator in 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer. We compared treatment plans developed with 2 different Elekta multileaf collimators (MLC): Beam Modulator micro-MLC (mMLC) (4-mm leaf width at the isocenter) and standard MLC (10-mm leaf width at the isocenter). The comparison was performed for 15 patients with localized prostate cancer in 3DCRT and IMRT delivery; a total of 60 treatment plans were processed. The dose-volume histograms were used to provide the quantitative comparison between plans. In particular, we analyzed differences between rectum and bladder sparing in terms of a set of appropriate Vx (percentage of organ at risk [OAR] volume receiving the x dose) and differences between target conformity and coverage in terms of coverage factor and conformation number. Our analysis demonstrates that in 3DCRT there is an advantage in the use of Elekta Beam Modulator mMLC in terms of organ sparing; in particular, a significant decrease in rectal V60 and V50 (p = 0.001) and in bladder V70 and V65 (p = 0.007 and 0.002, respectively) was found. Moreover, a better target dose conformity was obtained (p = 0.002). IMRT plans comparison demonstrated no significant differences between the use of the 4 or 10-mm MLCs. Our analysis shows that in 3DCRT the use of the Elekta Beam Modulator mMLC gives a gain in target conformity and in OARs dose sparing whereas in IMRT plans there is no advantage.
本研究的目的是分析医科达射束调制器在局限性前列腺癌的三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)和调强放射治疗(IMRT)中的剂量学效应。我们比较了使用两种不同的医科达多叶准直器(MLC)制定的治疗计划:射束调制器微型MLC(mMLC)(等中心处叶片宽度为4毫米)和标准MLC(等中心处叶片宽度为10毫米)。对15例局限性前列腺癌患者的3DCRT和IMRT治疗进行了比较;共处理了60个治疗计划。剂量体积直方图用于提供计划之间的定量比较。特别是,我们从一组适当的Vx(接受x剂量的危及器官[OAR]体积百分比)方面分析了直肠和膀胱 sparing 的差异,以及从覆盖因子和适形数方面分析了靶区适形性和覆盖范围的差异。我们的分析表明,在3DCRT中,使用医科达射束调制器mMLC在器官 sparing 方面具有优势;特别是,发现直肠V60和V50(p = 0.001)以及膀胱V70和V65(分别为p = 0.007和0.002)有显著降低。此外,获得了更好的靶区剂量适形性(p = 0.002)。IMRT计划比较表明,使用4毫米或10毫米MLC之间没有显著差异。我们的分析表明,在3DCRT中,使用医科达射束调制器mMLC在靶区适形性和OARs剂量 sparing 方面有增益,而在IMRT计划中没有优势。