Hao Zhichao, Chao Yonglie, Meng Yukun, Yin Hongmin
Postgraduate student, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Aug;112(2):235-40. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.027. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
Magnetic attachments are widely used in overdentures and maxillofacial prostheses. Because the patient will routinely have to insert and remove a removable prosthesis, the retentive force and magnetic flux leakage of the magnetic attachments after repeated insertion and removal must be evaluated to assess their clinical performance.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the retentive force and flux leakage of magnetic attachments after repeated insertion and removal.
Magfit EX600W magnet-keeper combinations (n=5) were used in this study. After 5000, 10,000, and 20,000 insertion-removal cycles, the retentive force of the magnetic attachments was measured 5 times at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min with a universal testing machine. Magnetic flux leakage at 3 positions (P1, the upper surface of the magnet; P2, the lower surface of the keeper; and P3, the lateral side of the magnetic attachment set) was evaluated with a gaussmeter. Data were statistically analyzed by 1-way ANOVA (α=.05). The morphology of the abraded surfaces for both the magnet and the keeper was observed with an optical microscope (5×).
The mean retentive force decreased significantly after 5000, 10,000, and 20,000 insertion-removal movements (P<.05). Significant differences of flux leakage were also observed at P1 after 5000 cycles and 10,000 cycles, at P2 after 5000 cycles, and at P3 after 5000, 10,000, and 20,000 insertion-removal cycles (P < .05). However, no significant differences in flux leakage were evident after 20,000 cycles at P1 and 10,000 cycles and 20,000 cycles at P2.
Repeated insertion and removal influenced the retentive force and magnetic flux leakage of the magnetic attachments. Retentive force decreased significantly after repeated insertion-removal cycles, whereas the variation of magnetic flux leakage depended on refitting cycles and positions of the magnetic attachments.
磁性附着体广泛应用于覆盖义齿和颌面修复体。由于患者需要常规地插入和取出可摘义齿,因此必须评估磁性附着体在反复插入和取出后的固位力和磁通量泄漏情况,以评估其临床性能。
本体外研究的目的是调查磁性附着体在反复插入和取出后的固位力和磁通量泄漏情况。
本研究使用了Magfit EX600W磁体-衔铁组合(n=5)。在进行5000、10000和20000次插入-取出循环后,使用万能试验机以5mm/min的十字头速度对磁性附着体的固位力进行5次测量。使用高斯计评估3个位置(P1,磁体上表面;P2,衔铁下表面;P3,磁性附着体组的侧面)的磁通量泄漏情况。数据采用单因素方差分析进行统计学分析(α=0.05)。使用光学显微镜(5×)观察磁体和衔铁磨损表面的形态。
在进行5000、10000和20000次插入-取出动作后,平均固位力显著下降(P<0.05)。在5000次循环和10000次循环后,P1处的磁通量泄漏也有显著差异;在5000次循环后,P2处有显著差异;在5000、10000和20000次插入-取出循环后,P3处有显著差异(P<0.05)。然而,在20000次循环后,P1处以及在10000次循环和20000次循环后P2处的磁通量泄漏没有明显差异。
反复插入和取出会影响磁性附着体的固位力和磁通量泄漏。反复插入-取出循环后固位力显著下降,而磁通量泄漏的变化取决于重新安装的循环次数和磁性附着体的位置。