Department of Psychiatry, Michigan State University, A-228 E. Fee Hall, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1316, USA,
Acad Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;21(2):86-90. doi: 10.1007/BF03341903.
This study's objective was to explore preclinical medical students' consideration of psychosocial variables in problem-based learning (PBL) cases. The authors used PBL cases that included psychosocial data and case content focused on behavioral science, biological science, or a combination of both. The authors compared, using one-way analysis of variance, the mean number of cues, learning issues, and hypotheses that the students generated in their written responses to PBL cases that varied in the amount of psychosocial content. The results revealed that the students identified psychosocial cues consistently across all curriculum segments, but the mean numbers of psychosocial hypotheses and learning issues were highest in the PBL case units dominated by psychosocial material. The authors conclude that the recognition of psychosocial data as germane disease variables is achieved more easily than the use of such data in a biopsychosocial formulation of traditional medical problems. A lack of sophistication and experience might make the latter task difficult to accomplish for many second-year medical students without using specific educational strategies.
本研究旨在探讨临床医学专业学生在基于问题的学习(PBL)案例中对社会心理变量的考虑。作者使用了包含社会心理数据的 PBL 案例,以及以行为科学、生物科学或两者结合为重点的案例内容。作者使用单因素方差分析比较了学生在 PBL 案例书面回答中生成的线索、学习问题和假设的平均值,这些 PBL 案例在社会心理内容的数量上有所不同。结果表明,学生在所有课程部分都一致地识别出社会心理线索,但在以社会心理材料为主导的 PBL 案例单元中,社会心理假设和学习问题的平均值最高。作者得出结论,识别社会心理数据作为相关疾病变量比在传统医学问题的生物心理社会表述中使用此类数据更容易。缺乏复杂性和经验可能会使许多二年级医学生难以完成后一项任务,如果不使用特定的教育策略的话。