Wang Tzung-Dau, Chen Ying-Hsien, Huang Chien-Hua, Chen Wen-Jone, Chen Ming-Fong
Cardiovascular Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Zhong-Shan S Rd, Taipei City, Taiwan 10002,
Hypertension. 2014 May;63(5):958-67. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02455. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
There are no reported studies assessing the effects of fixed-dose single-pill combinations (SPCs) of antihypertensive drugs on adherence in real-world patients with hypertension switched from free combinations to the corresponding SPCs. In this retrospective cohort study with a 1-year mirror-image design, a total of 896 patients who had been prescribed with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker and a thiazide-type diuretic within the preceding 12 months of the index (switching) date and the corresponding SPC within 12 months after the index date were included by using the Taiwan National Health Insurance database from January 2001 to December 2007. Adherence was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR). For patients switched to SPCs, the MPR increased significantly from 42% in the preindex period to 69% in the postindex period (relative difference, 75%; 95% confidence interval, 58%-100%; P<0.001). However, for switched patients with high adherence (MPR ≥0.8) in the preindex period, the MPR unexpectedly decreased in the postindex period (absolute difference, -13%; 95% confidence interval, -17% to -9%; P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, MPR difference was inversely related to the preindex MPR, the number of other antihypertensive drugs, and congestive heart failure. In summary, despite of the dramatic effect of SPCs on improving adherence, this strategy is not effective or even worse in patients adequately adhering to their free-combined antihypertensive regimens. The inverse association between adherence improvement and number of concurrent antihypertensive drugs suggests early use of SPCs to curtail the nonadherence gap.
尚无研究报告评估固定剂量单片复方制剂(SPC)对从自由联合用药转换为相应SPC的高血压患者在现实生活中的依从性影响。在这项采用1年镜像设计的回顾性队列研究中,利用2001年1月至2007年12月的台湾国民健康保险数据库,纳入了在索引(转换)日期前12个月内曾被处方使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂及噻嗪类利尿剂,且在索引日期后12个月内使用相应SPC的896例患者。依从性通过药物持有率(MPR)来衡量。对于转换为SPC的患者,MPR从索引前期的42%显著增加至索引后期的69%(相对差异为75%;95%置信区间为58%-100%;P<0.001)。然而,对于索引前期依从性高(MPR≥0.8)的转换患者,MPR在索引后期意外下降(绝对差异为-13%;95%置信区间为-17%至-9%;P<0.001)。在多变量分析中,MPR差异与索引前期MPR、其他抗高血压药物数量及充血性心力衰竭呈负相关。总之,尽管SPC对提高依从性有显著效果,但该策略对充分依从自由联合抗高血压治疗方案的患者无效甚至更糟。依从性改善与同时使用的抗高血压药物数量之间的负相关表明应尽早使用SPC以缩小不依从差距。