Suppr超能文献

助听设备用户指南:适合老年人使用。

Hearing aid user guides: suitability for older adults.

机构信息

* HEARing Cooperative Research Centre , Melbourne , Australia.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2014 Feb;53 Suppl 1:S43-51. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.832417. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyse the content, design, and readability of printed hearing aid user guides to determine their suitability for older adults, who are the main users of hearing aids.

DESIGN

Hearing aid user guides were assessed using four readability formulae and a standardized tool to assess content and design (SAM - Suitability Assessment of Materials).

STUDY SAMPLE

A sample of 36 hearing aid user guides (four user guides from nine different hearing aid manufacturers) were analysed.

RESULTS

Sixty nine percent of user guides were rated 'not suitable' and 31% were rated 'adequate' for their suitability. Many scored poorly for scope, vocabulary, aspects of layout and typography, and learning stimulation and motivation. The mean reading grade level for all user guides was grade 9.6 which is too high for older adults.

CONCLUSION

The content, design, and readability of hearing aid user guides are not optimal for older adults and thus may serve as a barrier to successful hearing aid outcomes for this population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析助听器用户指南的内容、设计和可读性,以确定其对主要使用者——老年人的适用性。

设计

使用四种可读性公式和一种标准化工具评估助听器用户指南的内容和设计(SAM-材料适用性评估)。

研究样本

分析了 36 份助听器用户指南(来自 9 家不同助听器制造商的 4 份用户指南)。

结果

69%的用户指南被评为“不适用”,31%的用户指南被评为“适用”。许多指南在范围、词汇、布局和排版方面、学习激励和动机方面得分都较低。所有用户指南的平均阅读水平为 9.6 年级,对于老年人来说太高了。

结论

助听器用户指南的内容、设计和可读性并不适合老年人,因此可能成为这一人群成功使用助听器的障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验