Saksena S, Calvo R A, Pantopoulos D, Gadhoke A, Rothbart S T
Fannie E. Rippel Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, New Jersey 07112.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987 Sep;10(5):1130-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb06132.x.
By using a prospective randomized study design, we compared the clinical efficacy and safety of single unidirectional and bidirectional transvenous cardioversion shocks for termination of rapid ventricular tachycardia (VT) having cycle lengths less than 300 ms. A Medtronic 6880 catheter was placed in the right ventricular apex and an R2 skin patch electrode was placed over the left scapula. Patients were randomized into two groups. Group A patients received unidirectional transvenous shocks using the two catheter electrodes (right ventricular apical cathode and superior vena caval anode) which resulted in a single current pathway. Group B patients received bidirectional transvenous shocks using a common cathode (right ventricular apex) and two separate anodes (superior vena caval and R2 patch) resulting in two current pathways. Identical shocks with total energies of 2.7, 5.0 and 10.0 J and waveform tilt of 27% were delivered to Groups A and B. In selected Group B patients, delivered shock currents through the right ventricular apex/superior vena caval and right ventricular apex/R2 patch electrode pairs were measured. We analyzed the initial episode of VT with a cycle length less than 300 ms in 33 patients with organic heart disease (mean age, 64 +/- 9 years; mean VT cycle length, 248 +/- 37 ms) who underwent programmed electrical stimulation. Transvenous cardioversion shocks terminated 31% of 16 VT episodes in Group A and 41% of 17 VT episodes in Group B (p greater than .2). The mean successful shock energy was 6.1 +/- 3.7 J in Group A and 3.0 +/- 0.9 J in Group B (p less than .05). Forty percent of all successfully cardioverted episodes in Group A and 86% of all successfully cardioverted VT episodes in Group B were terminated at an energy of 2.7 J (p = .09). Analysis of shock waveforms in Group B revealed 47 to 74% of the total current was transmitted through the right ventricular apex/superior vena caval electrodes and 26 to 53% through the right ventricular apex/R2 electrodes. We conclude that single bidirectional transvenous shocks are effective for rapid VT termination in selected patients. Dual current pathways decrease energies needed for successful transvenous cardioversion in this patient population.
通过前瞻性随机研究设计,我们比较了单向和双向经静脉心脏复律电击对终止周期长度小于300毫秒的快速室性心动过速(VT)的临床疗效和安全性。将美敦力6880导管置于右心室心尖,将R2皮肤贴片电极置于左肩胛骨上方。患者被随机分为两组。A组患者使用两个导管电极(右心室心尖阴极和上腔静脉阳极)接受单向经静脉电击,形成单一电流路径。B组患者使用共同阴极(右心室心尖)和两个单独阳极(上腔静脉和R2贴片)接受双向经静脉电击,形成两条电流路径。向A组和B组输送总能量为2.7、5.0和10.0焦耳且波形倾斜度为27%的相同电击。在选定的B组患者中,测量了通过右心室心尖/上腔静脉和右心室心尖/R2贴片电极对输送的电击电流。我们分析了33例患有器质性心脏病(平均年龄64±9岁;平均VT周期长度248±37毫秒)并接受程序电刺激的患者中周期长度小于300毫秒的VT初始发作情况。经静脉心脏复律电击终止了A组16次VT发作中的31%和B组17次VT发作中的41%(p大于0.2)。A组平均成功电击能量为6.1±3.7焦耳,B组为3.0±0.9焦耳(p小于0.05)。A组所有成功复律发作的40%和B组所有成功复律VT发作的86%在2.7焦耳能量时终止(p = 0.09)。对B组电击波形的分析显示,总电流的47%至74%通过右心室心尖/上腔静脉电极传输,26%至53%通过右心室心尖/R2电极传输。我们得出结论,单次双向经静脉电击对选定患者快速终止VT有效。双电流路径降低了该患者群体成功经静脉心脏复律所需的能量。