Eby Elizabeth L, Zagar Anthony J, Wang Ping, Curtis Bradley H, Xie Jin, Haldane Diane C, Idris Iskandar, Peters Anne L, Hood Robert C, Jackson Jeffrey A
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana Biogen Idec, Weston, Massachusetts.
Endocr Pract. 2014 Jul;20(7):663-70. doi: 10.4158/EP13407.OR.
Describe the characteristics, costs, and adherence of patients receiving human regular U-500 insulin (U-500R) compared with those of patients receiving high-dose (≥150 units/day) U-100 insulin.
Data from Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases, July 1, 2008, through December 31, 2010, were used. The U-100 cohort received ≥150 units/day of U-100 insulin for ≥31 days during the first 60 days after the index date. The U-500R cohort received ≥2 prescriptions of U-500R after the index date. Analyses were performed on propensity-matched cohorts. The changes in annualized costs were compared between the 2 cohorts using paired t tests. Adherence was assessed by the proportion of days covered (PDC) and compared using a 2-sample t test. Glycemic efficacy data were not available in this database.
There were 1,044 U-500R-treated patients (19.1% with type 1 diabetes [T1D]) and 11,520 U-100-treated patients (23.8% with T1D) identified, from which 1,039 matched pairs were obtained. The mean decrease of $1,290 in annual pharmacy costs for the U-500R cohort was significantly different from the mean increase of $2,586 for the U-100 cohort (P<.001; 95% confidence interval, -$4,345 to -$3,422). More U-500R patients experienced hypoglycemia (17.3% vs. 11.8%; P<.001), but the hypoglycemia rate per person and related costs were not significantly different between cohorts. Finally, the mean 12-month PDC was 65.0% for U-500R versus 47.6% for U-100 patients (P<.0001).
Compared with treatment with ≥150 units/day of U-100 insulin, treatment with U-500R was associated with decreases in pharmacy costs, a higher percentage of patients experiencing hypoglycemia, and greater treatment adherence.
描述接受人常规U-500胰岛素(U-500R)治疗的患者与接受高剂量(≥150单位/天)U-100胰岛素治疗的患者的特征、成本和依从性。
使用来自Truven Health MarketScan研究数据库2008年7月1日至2010年12月31日的数据。U-100队列在索引日期后的前60天内,连续31天及以上每天接受≥150单位的U-100胰岛素治疗。U-500R队列在索引日期后接受≥2张U-500R处方。对倾向匹配队列进行分析。使用配对t检验比较两组队列年化成本的变化。通过覆盖天数比例(PDC)评估依从性,并使用双样本t检验进行比较。该数据库中没有血糖疗效数据。
共识别出1044例接受U-500R治疗的患者(19.1%为1型糖尿病[T1D])和11520例接受U-100治疗的患者(23.8%为T1D),从中获得1039对匹配对。U-500R队列的年度药房成本平均降低1290美元,与U-100队列平均增加2586美元有显著差异(P<.001;95%置信区间,-$4345至-$3422)。更多U-500R患者发生低血糖(17.3%对11.8%;P<.001),但两组队列中人均低血糖发生率及相关成本无显著差异。最后,U-500R患者的平均12个月PDC为65.0%,而U-100患者为47.6%(P<.0001)。
与每天≥150单位U-100胰岛素治疗相比,U-500R治疗与药房成本降低、低血糖患者比例更高以及治疗依从性更好相关。