St Clair Mitchell, Mehta Hardik, Sacrinty Matthew, Johnson Dominic, Robinson Killian
Department of Cardiology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Clin Cardiol. 2014 Apr;37(4):233-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.22245. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
Diabetic patients have a worse prognosis than nondiabetic patients after myocardial infarction. Although exercise improves risk factors, exercise capacity, and mortality, it is still unclear if these benefits are the same as in nondiabetics. Furthermore, although exercise tolerance is predicted by systolic and diastolic dysfunction in nondiabetics, its role as a predictor of exercise capacity in diabetics remains unclear.
Diabetics and nondiabetics see a similar improvement in their cardiac risk factors and exercise parameters from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR).
A series of 370 diabetics and 942 nondiabetics entered a 36-session outpatient CR program after interventions for coronary heart disease or after bypass or cardiac valve surgery. The program consisted of physical exercise, lifestyle modification, and pharmacotherapy.
Quality of life, weight, blood pressure, and lipid profiles improved significantly in both groups during the 12-week program. Baseline metabolic equivalents (METs) were lower in diabetics vs nondiabetics at the start of CR (2.4 vs 2.7, P < 0.001). Although both groups increased their exercise capacity, diabetics had less improvement (change in METs 1.7 vs 2.6, P < 0.001). Significant predictors for improvement after CR included age, sex, and weight, as well as both systolic and diastolic function. After adjustment for these, diabetes remained a significant predictor of reduced improvement in exercise capacity.
Diabetics saw a significant benefit in quality of life, weight, exercise tolerance, and cardiac risk factors, but to a lesser extent when compared with nondiabetics. The mechanisms for poorer improvement in diabetics following CR also include noncardiac factors and require further study.
糖尿病患者心肌梗死后的预后比非糖尿病患者更差。尽管运动可改善危险因素、运动能力和死亡率,但这些益处是否与非糖尿病患者相同仍不清楚。此外,虽然在非糖尿病患者中运动耐量可由收缩和舒张功能障碍预测,但其作为糖尿病患者运动能力预测指标的作用仍不明确。
糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者通过基于运动的心脏康复(CR),在心脏危险因素和运动参数方面有相似的改善。
370例糖尿病患者和942例非糖尿病患者在接受冠心病干预、搭桥手术或心脏瓣膜手术后,参加了一个为期36节的门诊CR项目。该项目包括体育锻炼、生活方式改变和药物治疗。
在为期12周的项目中,两组患者的生活质量、体重、血压和血脂谱均有显著改善。CR开始时,糖尿病患者的基线代谢当量(METs)低于非糖尿病患者(2.4对2.7,P<0.001)。虽然两组患者的运动能力均有所提高,但糖尿病患者的改善程度较小(METs变化为1.7对2.6,P<0.001)。CR后改善的显著预测因素包括年龄、性别、体重以及收缩和舒张功能。在对这些因素进行调整后,糖尿病仍然是运动能力改善降低的显著预测因素。
糖尿病患者在生活质量、体重、运动耐量和心脏危险因素方面有显著益处,但与非糖尿病患者相比程度较小。糖尿病患者CR后改善较差的机制还包括非心脏因素,需要进一步研究。