Doyle Adam J, Stone Jonathan J, Carnicelli Anthony P, Chandra Ankur, Gillespie David L
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Care Center, Charlton Hospital, Southcoast Health Systems, Fall River MA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Jul;28(5):1219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.12.008. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
Validation of carotid duplex ultrasound velocity criteria (CDUS VC) to grade the severity of extracranial carotid artery stenosis has traditionally been based on conventional angiography measurements. In the last decade, computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has largely replaced conventional arch and carotid arteriography (CA) for diagnostic purposes. Given the low number of CA being performed, it is impractical to expect noninvasive vascular laboratories to be validated using this modality. CDUS VC have not been developed with the use of CTA-derived measurements. The objective was to determine optimal CDUS VC from CTA-derived measurements with the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method for 50% and 80% stenosis.
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CDUS and CTA from 2000 to 2009 was performed. Vessel diameters were measured on CTA, and corresponding CDUS velocities were recorded. Percent stenosis was calculated using the NASCET method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for internal carotid artery (ICA) peak systolic velocity (PSV), ICA end diastolic velocity (EDV), and ICA PSV to common carotid artery PSV ratio (PSVR) for 50% and 80% stenosis. Velocity cut points were determined with equal weighting of sensitivity and specificity.
A total of 575 vessels were analyzed to create the ROC curves. A 50% stenosis analysis yielded ideal cut points for PSV, EDV, and PSVR of 130 cm/sec, 42 cm/sec, and 1.75. An 80% stenosis analysis yielded ideal cut points for PSV, EDV, and PSVR of 297 cm/sec, 84 cm/sec, and 3.06.
CTA-derived CDUS VC appeared to be reliable in defining 50% and 80% stenosis in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Although CDUS VC defined in this study were different from many of the previously published VC for the same percent stenosis, there were many similarities to those reported by the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. We feel that CTA should be the gold standard imaging technique for validating CDUS VC.
传统上,用于评估颅外颈动脉狭窄严重程度的颈动脉双功超声速度标准(CDUS VC)的验证是基于传统血管造影测量。在过去十年中,计算机断层血管造影(CTA)在很大程度上已取代传统的主动脉弓和颈动脉造影(CA)用于诊断目的。鉴于进行CA的数量较少,期望无创血管实验室使用这种方式进行验证是不切实际的。CDUS VC并非基于CTA衍生测量数据制定。目的是使用北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)方法,从CTA衍生测量数据中确定50%和80%狭窄的最佳CDUS VC。
对2000年至2009年期间接受CDUS和CTA检查的所有患者进行回顾性分析。在CTA上测量血管直径,并记录相应的CDUS速度。使用NASCET方法计算狭窄百分比。针对50%和80%狭窄,生成颈内动脉(ICA)收缩期峰值速度(PSV)、ICA舒张末期速度(EDV)以及ICA PSV与颈总动脉PSV比值(PSVR)的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线。通过对敏感性和特异性进行同等加权来确定速度切点。
共分析了575条血管以绘制ROC曲线。对于50%狭窄的分析得出,PSV、EDV和PSVR的理想切点分别为130 cm/秒、42 cm/秒和1.75。对于80%狭窄的分析得出,PSV、EDV和PSVR的理想切点分别为297 cm/秒、84 cm/秒和3.06。
CTA衍生的CDUS VC在定义颈动脉狭窄患者的50%和80%狭窄方面似乎是可靠的。尽管本研究中定义的CDUS VC与之前发表的相同狭窄百分比的许多VC不同,但与超声放射学会共识会议报告的结果有许多相似之处。我们认为CTA应是验证CDUS VC的金标准成像技术。