Cooke Steven J, Blumstein Daniel T, Buchholz Richard, Caro Tim, Fernández-Juricic Esteban, Franklin Craig E, Metcalfe Julian, O'Connor Constance M, St Clair Colleen Cassady, Sutherland William J, Wikelski Martin
Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada; 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, 621 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, California 90095; 3Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677; 4Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616; 5Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, 915 West State Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907; 6School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia; 7Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, United Kingdom; 8Aquatic Behavioural Ecology Lab, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada; 9Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada; 10Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom; 11Max Planck Institute of Ornithology, D-78315 Radolfzell, Germany, and University of Konstanz, D-78467 Konstanz, Germany.
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2014 Jan-Feb;87(1):1-14. doi: 10.1086/671165. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
Many animal populations are in decline as a result of human activity. Conservation practitioners are attempting to prevent further declines and loss of biodiversity as well as to facilitate recovery of endangered species, and they often rely on interdisciplinary approaches to generate conservation solutions. Two recent interfaces in conservation science involve animal behavior (i.e., conservation behavior) and physiology (i.e., conservation physiology). To date, these interfaces have been considered separate entities, but from both pragmatic and biological perspectives, there is merit in better integrating behavior and physiology to address applied conservation problems and to inform resource management. Although there are some institutional, conceptual, methodological, and communication-oriented challenges to integrating behavior and physiology to inform conservation actions, most of these barriers can be overcome. Through outlining several successful examples that integrate these disciplines, we conclude that physiology and behavior can together generate meaningful data to support animal conservation and management actions. Tangentially, applied conservation and management problems can, in turn, also help advance and reinvigorate the fundamental disciplines of animal physiology and behavior by providing advanced natural experiments that challenge traditional frameworks.
由于人类活动,许多动物种群数量正在减少。保护工作者正试图防止生物多样性的进一步减少和丧失,并促进濒危物种的恢复,他们经常依靠跨学科方法来制定保护方案。保护科学领域最近出现的两个交叉领域涉及动物行为学(即保护行为学)和生理学(即保护生理学)。迄今为止,这些交叉领域一直被视为相互独立的实体,但从实际应用和生物学角度来看,更好地整合行为学和生理学,以解决实际保护问题并为资源管理提供依据,是有价值的。尽管将行为学和生理学整合起来为保护行动提供信息存在一些制度、概念、方法以及沟通方面的挑战,但其中大多数障碍是可以克服的。通过列举几个整合了这些学科的成功案例,我们得出结论,生理学和行为学能够共同产生有意义的数据,以支持动物保护和管理行动。顺便提一下,实际的保护和管理问题反过来也有助于推进和振兴动物生理学和行为学这些基础学科,因为它们提供了挑战传统框架的前沿自然实验。