Moore Joshua J, Matlock Aaron G
Franklin College, Franklin, Indiana.
Department of Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medicine Residency, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington.
J Emerg Med. 2014 May;46(5):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.035. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
In caring for patients in the Emergency Department (ED), the emergency physician (EP) will often utilize consulting specialists and pharmacists. In the event of an untoward patient outcome, disagreement may arise regarding the liability of each provider. Here, we review a series of malpractice cases involving consulting physicians and pharmacists to illustrate the legal principles of physician-patient relationships and physician duty. Determination of liability in the courts will rest, in part, on whether a physician-patient relationship was formed via an "affirmative act". Consulting physicians may establish a relationship through an overt or implied agreement to participate in a patient's care, or by reviewing specific tests and studies for the purpose of diagnosis and treatment. The courts have defined the duty of the pharmacist to safely dispense medication, and have ascribed the duty to warn of medication side effects to the prescribing physician.
在急诊科(ED)护理患者时,急诊医生(EP)通常会借助会诊专家和药剂师的力量。若患者出现不良后果,各方提供者的责任归属可能会引发争议。在此,我们回顾一系列涉及会诊医生和药剂师的医疗事故案例,以阐明医患关系和医生职责的法律原则。法庭上责任的判定部分取决于医患关系是否通过“积极行为”得以确立。会诊医生可通过公开或默示的参与患者护理协议,或为诊断和治疗目的审查特定检查及研究结果来建立这种关系。法庭已明确药剂师有安全配药的职责,并将药物副作用告知义务归于开处方的医生。