Norton Robert P, Milne Edward L, Kaimrajh David N, Eismont Frank J, Latta Loren L, Williams Seth K
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, PO Box 016960 (D-27), Miami, FL 33101, USA.
Max Biedermann Institute for Biomechanics, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Department of Research, 4300 Alton Road, Miami Beach, FL 33140, USA.
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1734-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.035. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
Conventionally, short-segment fusion involves instrumentation of one healthy vertebra above and below the injured vertebra, skipping the injured level. This short-segment construct places less surgical burden on the patient compared with long-segment constructs, but is less stable biomechanically, and thus has resulted in clinical failures. The addition of two screws placed in the fractured vertebral body represents an attempt to improve the construct stiffness without sacrificing the benefits of short-segment fusion.
To determine the biomechanical differences between four- and six-screw short-segment constructs for the operative management of an unstable L1 fracture.
Biomechanical study of instrumentation in vertebral body cadaveric models simulating an L1 axial load injury pattern.
Thirteen intact spinal segments from T12 to L2 were prepared from fresh-frozen cadaver spines. An axial load fracture of at least 50% vertebral body height was produced at L1 and then instrumented with pedicle screws. Specimens were evaluated in terms of construct stiffness, motion, and rod strain. Two conditions were tested: a four-screw construct with no screws at the L1 fractured body (4S) and a six-screw construct with screws at all levels (6S). The two groups were compared statistically by paired Student t test.
The mean stiffness in flexion-extension was increased 31% (p<.03) with the addition of the two pedicle screws in L1. Relative motion in terms of vertical and axial rotations was not significantly different between the two groups. The L1-L2 rod strain was significantly increased in the six-screw construct compared with the four-screw construct (p<.001).
In a cadaveric L1 axial load fracture model, a six-screw construct with screws in the fractured level is more rigid than a four-screw construct that skips the injured vertebral body.
传统上,短节段融合术需要在损伤椎体上方和下方各一个健康椎体上进行内固定,跳过损伤节段。与长节段固定相比,这种短节段结构给患者带来的手术负担较小,但生物力学稳定性较差,因此导致了临床失败。在骨折椎体中增加两枚螺钉是为了在不牺牲短节段融合术优势的前提下提高结构刚度。
确定用于不稳定L1骨折手术治疗的四枚螺钉和六枚螺钉短节段结构之间的生物力学差异。
在模拟L1轴向载荷损伤模式的椎体尸体模型中对内固定进行生物力学研究。
从新鲜冷冻尸体脊柱上制备13个从T12到L2的完整脊柱节段。在L1造成至少50%椎体高度的轴向载荷骨折,然后用椎弓根螺钉进行内固定。对标本进行结构刚度、活动度和棒材应变评估。测试两种情况:L1骨折椎体无螺钉的四枚螺钉结构(4S)和所有节段均有螺钉的六枚螺钉结构(6S)。两组采用配对学生t检验进行统计学比较。
在L1增加两枚椎弓根螺钉后,屈伸平均刚度增加31%(p<0.03)。两组在垂直和轴向旋转方面的相对活动度无显著差异。与四枚螺钉结构相比,六枚螺钉结构中L1-L2棒材应变显著增加(p<0.001)。
在尸体L1轴向载荷骨折模型中,骨折节段有螺钉的六枚螺钉结构比跳过损伤椎体的四枚螺钉结构更坚固。