Suppr超能文献

预防化疗引起的手足综合征的策略:前瞻性随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prevention strategies for chemotherapy-induced hand-foot syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomised trials.

机构信息

Clinical Oncology Division, General Hospital, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Vital Brasil, 251 - Cidade Universitária, 13083000, Campinas, Brazil,

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jun;22(6):1585-93. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2129-z. Epub 2014 Jan 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Hand-foot syndrome (HSF) is a distinctive adverse event relatively frequent to some chemotherapeutic agents as capecitabine, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, sorafenib and other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. Since the prevention of HFS would be crucial to avoid treatment interruptions and delays, many studies have been conducted with this purpose.

METHODS

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the clinical efficacy of prevention strategies for HFS, through a wide search of electronic databases as well as congress abstracts. The endpoints evaluated were the dichotomic data for mild (Grade 1), moderate to severe (Grades 2 to 3) and all-grade HFS. Meta-analysis was calculated through RevMan v5.1 software.

RESULTS

Amongst 295 studies identified, only ten met the inclusion criteria. Celecoxib prevented both moderate to severe (odds ratio [OR] 0.39, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.73, P = 0.003) and all-grade HFS (OR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.29-0.78, P = 0.003), whereas pyridoxine and topical urea/lactic acid formulations failed to prove efficacy. There were no proven benefits in mild HFS. The use of topical antiperspirant has not been shown to improve results, according to a single trial.

CONCLUSIONS

From all available possibilities for the prevention of HFS, celecoxib appears to be the most promising, with statistically significant results. Larger, multicentric studies are required to reinforce this finding.

摘要

目的

手足综合征(HSF)是一种独特的不良反应,相对频繁地发生于某些化疗药物,如卡培他滨、聚乙二醇脂质体阿霉素、索拉非尼和其他酪氨酸激酶抑制剂。由于预防 HFS 对于避免治疗中断和延迟至关重要,因此已经进行了许多研究。

方法

本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是通过广泛搜索电子数据库和会议摘要来分析 HFS 预防策略的临床疗效。评估的终点是轻度(1 级)、中重度(2-3 级)和所有级别 HFS 的二分数据。通过 RevMan v5.1 软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

在确定的 295 项研究中,只有 10 项符合纳入标准。塞来昔布可预防中重度(比值比 [OR] 0.39,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.20-0.73,P=0.003)和所有级别 HFS(OR 0.47,95%CI 0.29-0.78,P=0.003),而吡哆醇和局部尿素/乳酸制剂未能证明疗效。轻度 HFS 无明显获益。一项试验表明,局部止汗剂的使用并不能改善结果。

结论

在预防 HFS 的所有可用方法中,塞来昔布似乎最有前途,结果具有统计学意义。需要更大规模的多中心研究来证实这一发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验