Acquired Brain Injury Ireland, Mid-West Region, Republic of Ireland.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014 Mar;29(2):194-205. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act118. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of contact versus education interventions for adolescents in reducing stigmatizing attitudes toward people with acquired brain injury (ABI), and whether visibility of ABI affects the intervention outcome. 408 students (age range = 14-17 years) from 13 schools in the Mid-West of Ireland were randomly allocated to one of the three interventions: Education only, Contact (Visible Disability), or Contact ("Invisible" Disability). Stigmatizing attitudes were measured before and after intervention. Results suggest that a Contact intervention was more effective in reducing stigmatizing attitudes in terms of social restrictiveness, benevolence, and community mental health beliefs than education alone. Visibility of ABI impacted the effectiveness of the contact intervention on Community Mental Health beliefs only. Contact with a person with ABI is thus more effective in promoting positive attitudes than ABI education alone, while the presence of visible impairment was not found to increase this intervention effect.
本研究旨在确定接触干预和教育干预对减少青少年对后天脑损伤(ABI)患者的污名化态度的有效性,以及 ABI 的可见性是否会影响干预效果。来自爱尔兰中西部 13 所学校的 408 名学生(年龄范围为 14-17 岁)被随机分配到以下三种干预措施之一:仅教育、接触(可见残疾)或接触(“隐形”残疾)。在干预前后测量了污名化态度。结果表明,与单纯教育相比,接触干预在减少社会限制、仁慈和社区心理健康信念方面对减少污名化态度更为有效。只有 ABI 的可见性会影响接触干预对社区心理健康信念的效果。因此,与 ABI 教育相比,与患有 ABI 的人接触更能促进积极的态度,而可见的损伤并不增加这种干预效果。