Emerson Eric, Robertson Janet, Baines Susannah, Hatton Chris
Centre for Disability Research, Lancaster University, UK; Centre for Disability Research and Policy, University of Sydney, Australia.
Centre for Disability Research, Lancaster University, UK.
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Mar;35(3):591-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
People with intellectual disability have significantly higher age-adjusted rates of mortality and morbidity than their non-disabled peers. While self-rated health status is commonly used as an indicator of the health status of populations of interest, few studies have explored the self-rated health of adults with intellectual disability. We undertook secondary analysis of de-identified cross-sectional data from the first waves of two contemporary UK surveys: the Life Opportunities Survey (n=37,513) and Understanding Society (n=50,976). In the Life Opportunities Survey we identified 316 participants age 16-49 (1.7% of the age-restricted sample) as having intellectual disability. In Understanding Society we identified 415 participants age 16-49 (1.5% of the age-restricted sample) as having intellectual disability. Participants with intellectual disability were significantly more likely to report having fair or worse health than their peers (Life Opportunities Survey OR=8.86 (6.54-12.01), p<0.001; Understanding Society OR=13.14 (10.65-16.21), p<0.001). However the strength of this association was significantly attenuated when risk estimates were adjusted to take account of the increased rates of exposure of participants with intellectual disability to socio-economic disadvantage and (in the Life Opportunities Survey) exposure to discrimination and violence.
与无智力残疾的同龄人相比,智力残疾者经年龄调整后的死亡率和发病率要高得多。虽然自评健康状况通常被用作衡量相关人群健康状况的指标,但很少有研究探讨成年智力残疾者的自评健康情况。我们对来自英国两项当代调查首轮的匿名横断面数据进行了二次分析:《生活机会调查》(n = 37,513)和《理解社会》(n = 50,976)。在《生活机会调查》中,我们确定316名年龄在16 - 49岁的参与者(占年龄受限样本的1.7%)患有智力残疾。在《理解社会》中,我们确定415名年龄在16 - 49岁的参与者(占年龄受限样本的1.5%)患有智力残疾。与同龄人相比,智力残疾参与者报告健康状况为“一般”或更差的可能性显著更高(《生活机会调查》中比值比为8.86(6.54 - 12.01),p < 0.001;《理解社会》中比值比为13.14(10.65 - 16.21),p < 0.001)。然而,当对风险估计进行调整以考虑到智力残疾参与者面临社会经济劣势的比例增加以及(在《生活机会调查》中)遭受歧视和暴力的比例增加时,这种关联的强度显著减弱。