Krebs Christopher
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014 Jul;15(3):170-180. doi: 10.1177/1524838014521028. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
Rennison and Addington use National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) data to document the fact that college women experience violent victimization at a lower rate than women of the same age who do not attend college, which refutes the idea that women in college are at increased risk of being victimized. The measurement of victimization, especially sexual victimization, is, however, a topic that has be the source of much debate. Bureau of Justice Statistics is currently exploring what are the best methods for measuring sexual victimization within the NCVS, and recent methodological research, which is summarized in this article, could inform this process. Although consensus has seemingly been forming around come methods, such as using self-administered survey instruments and behaviorally specific questions when trying to measure sexual victimization, the jury is still out on some other design fronts. What is not clear is whether we need the jury to come in, so to speak. Some methodological variation might be acceptable, especially if the various methods being considered are producing similar results.
伦尼森和阿丁顿利用全国犯罪受害者调查(NCVS)数据来证明这样一个事实:与未上大学的同龄女性相比,大学女生遭受暴力侵害的比率更低,这反驳了大学女生遭受侵害风险更高的观点。然而,侵害行为的衡量,尤其是性侵害的衡量,一直是一个备受争议的话题。美国司法统计局目前正在探索在全国犯罪受害者调查中衡量性侵害的最佳方法,本文总结的近期方法学研究可为这一过程提供参考。尽管围绕一些方法似乎已形成共识,比如在试图衡量性侵害时使用自行填写的调查问卷和行为特定问题,但在其他一些设计方面仍尚无定论。可以说,尚不清楚我们是否需要达成一致意见。一些方法上的差异可能是可以接受的,尤其是如果所考虑的各种方法产生的结果相似。