Sclafani Francesco, Cunningham David
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom.
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2014 Jan;5(1):78-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
The progressively ageing population combined with an increased availability of antitumoural agents has created a new, challenging therapeutic scenario for oncologists. Due to the lack of evidence-based data on elderly patients it is uncertain whether the criteria for assessing the risk/benefit ratio of treatment strategies in these patients coincide with those classically used for the general population. A critical reevaluation of the role and potential options of systemic chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is warranted as the historical conservative approach of oncologists may have resulted in undertreatment of this patient population. Bevacizumab was demonstrated to improve the outcome of mCRC patients when used in combination with standard first and second line chemotherapy. However, its toxicity profile including hypertension, thromboembolic events, haemorrhage and proteinuria may raise important concerns when this anti-angiogenic agent is used in elderly patients with comorbidities. In this review article we analyse the available evidence on the safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab in elderly mCRC patients. Based on the data from subgroup or pooled analysis of prospective trials, observational cohort studies, retrospective population-based studies and a single recent randomised phase III trial, we conclude that the clinical benefit and safety profile of bevacizumab in elderly patients are not significantly different from those reported in younger patients, with the exception of an increased risk of arterial thromboembolic events. Bevacizumab should therefore be considered as a potential therapeutic option for elderly patients with mCRC.
人口老龄化的加剧,再加上抗肿瘤药物的可及性增加,给肿瘤学家带来了一个全新的、具有挑战性的治疗局面。由于缺乏针对老年患者的循证数据,尚不确定评估这些患者治疗策略风险/获益比的标准是否与一般人群经典使用的标准一致。鉴于肿瘤学家以往保守的治疗方法可能导致这部分患者治疗不足,有必要对老年转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者全身化疗的作用和潜在选择进行批判性重新评估。贝伐单抗与标准一线和二线化疗联合使用时,已证明可改善mCRC患者的预后。然而,当这种抗血管生成药物用于合并症老年患者时,其毒性特征(包括高血压、血栓栓塞事件、出血和蛋白尿)可能引发重要担忧。在这篇综述文章中,我们分析了贝伐单抗在老年mCRC患者中的安全性和有效性的现有证据。基于前瞻性试验的亚组或汇总分析、观察性队列研究、基于人群的回顾性研究以及最近一项随机III期试验的数据,我们得出结论,除动脉血栓栓塞事件风险增加外,贝伐单抗在老年患者中的临床获益和安全性与年轻患者报告的情况无显著差异。因此,贝伐单抗应被视为老年mCRC患者的一种潜在治疗选择。