Berkseth Timothy J, Mathiason Michelle A, Jafari Mary Ellen, Cogbill Thomas H, Patel Nirav Y
Department of Medical Education, Gundersen Medical Foundation, La Crosse, WI, USA.
Department of Medical Research, Gundersen Medical Foundation, La Crosse, WI, USA.
Injury. 2014 May;45(5):835-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
Computed tomography (CT) plays an integral role in the evaluation and management of trauma patients. As the number of referring hospital (RH)-based CT scanners increased, so has their utilization in trauma patients before transfer. We hypothesized that this has resulted in increased time at RH, image duplication, and radiation dose.
A retrospective chart review was completed for trauma activations transferred to an ACS-verified Level II Trauma Centre (TC) during two time periods: 2002-2004 (Group 1) and 2006-2008 (Group 2). 2005 data were excluded as this marked the transition period for acquisition of hospital-based CT scanners in RH. Statistical analysis included t test and χ(2) analysis. P<0.05 was considered significant.
1017 patients met study criteria: 503 in group 1 and 514 in group 2. Mean age was greater in group 2 compared to group 1 (40.3 versus 37.4, respectively; P=0.028). There were 115 patients in group 1 versus 202 patients in group 2 who underwent CT imaging at RH (P<0.001). Conversely, 326 patients in group 1 had CT scans performed at the TC versus 258 patients in group 2 (P<0.001). Mean time at the RH was similar between the groups (117.1 and 112.3min for group 1 and 2, respectively; P=0.561). However, when comparing patients with and without a pretransfer CT at the RH, the median time at RH was 140 versus 67min, respectively (P<0.001). The number of patients with duplicate CT imaging (n=34 in group 1 and n=42 in group 2) was not significantly different between the two time periods (P=0.392). Head CTs comprised the majority of duplicate CT imaging in both time periods (82.4% in group 1 and 90.5% in group 2). Mean total estimated radiation dose per patient was not significantly different between the two groups (group 1=8.4mSv versus group 2=7.8mSv; P=0.192).
A significant increase in CT imaging at the RH prior to transfer to the TC was observed over the study periods. No associated increases in mean time at the RH, image duplication at TC, total estimated radiation dose per patient, and mortality rate were observed.
计算机断层扫描(CT)在创伤患者的评估和管理中起着不可或缺的作用。随着基于转诊医院(RH)的CT扫描仪数量增加,其在创伤患者转运前的使用也有所增加。我们推测这导致了在RH停留时间延长、图像重复以及辐射剂量增加。
对在两个时间段(2002 - 2004年,第1组;2006 - 2008年,第2组)转运至经美国外科学院(ACS)认证的二级创伤中心(TC)的创伤激活病例进行回顾性病历审查。排除2005年的数据,因为这标志着RH获取医院CT扫描仪的过渡期。统计分析包括t检验和χ²分析。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
1017例患者符合研究标准:第1组503例,第2组514例。第2组的平均年龄高于第1组(分别为40.3岁和37.4岁;P = 0.028)。第1组有115例患者在RH接受CT成像,第2组有202例(P < 0.001)。相反,第1组有326例患者在TC进行CT扫描,第2组有258例(P < 0.001)。两组在RH的平均停留时间相似(第1组和第2组分别为117.1分钟和112.3分钟;P = 0.561)。然而,比较在RH有和没有转运前CT的患者时,在RH的中位停留时间分别为140分钟和67分钟(P < 0.001)。两个时间段内重复CT成像的患者数量(第1组34例,第2组42例)无显著差异(P = 0.392)。两个时间段内头部CT在重复CT成像中占大多数(第1组为82.4%,第2组为90.5%)。两组患者的平均总估计辐射剂量无显著差异(第1组 = 8.4mSv,第2组 = 7.8mSv;P = 0.192)。
在研究期间,观察到转运至TC之前在RH进行CT成像的情况显著增加。未观察到在RH的平均停留时间、TC的图像重复、每位患者的总估计辐射剂量以及死亡率有相关增加。