Kule Amy, Hang Bophal, Bahl Amit
Department of Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
J Emerg Med. 2014 May;46(5):659-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.088. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
Venous access can occasionally be difficult to obtain secondary to near-complete compressibility of peripheral veins in some patients.
This study utilizes ultrasound to assess vein compressibility with different tourniquet techniques commonly available in the emergency department.
After approval by the Institutional Review Board, a prospective single-center study was conducted assessing the compressibility of basilic veins with ultrasound. Compressibility was assessed at baseline, use of one proximal tourniquet, two tourniquets (one distal and one proximal), and a proximal blood pressure cuff inflated to 150 mm Hg. Vein compressibility was rated as complete, moderate, or mild after light pressure was applied with the ultrasound probe.
One hundred healthy patients were recruited into the study. Ninety-eight subjects had completely compressible basilic veins at baseline. When one tourniquet and two tourniquets were applied, 62 and 31 participants, respectively, demonstrated completely compressible veins. Fisher's exact test comparing one vs. two tourniquets revealed no difference between these two techniques (p = 0.4614). Only two participants continued to have a completely compressible vein after application of the blood pressure cuff with statistical significance by Fisher's exact test compared to both tourniquet groups (p < 0.0001).
Both tourniquets and blood pressure cuffs can decrease the compressibility of peripheral veins. Although no difference was identified between one and two tourniquets, utilization of blood pressure cuffs significantly decreased compressibility. The findings of this study can be utilized in the emergency department when attempting to obtain peripheral venous access, specifically supporting the use of blood pressure cuffs to decrease compressibility.
在某些患者中,由于外周静脉几乎完全可压缩,静脉穿刺有时难以成功。
本研究利用超声评估急诊科常用的不同止血带技术对静脉可压缩性的影响。
经机构审查委员会批准后,进行了一项前瞻性单中心研究,用超声评估贵要静脉的可压缩性。在基线、使用一个近端止血带、两个止血带(一个远端和一个近端)以及将近端血压袖带充气至150 mmHg时评估可压缩性。在用超声探头施加轻压后,将静脉可压缩性评为完全、中度或轻度。
100名健康患者被纳入研究。98名受试者在基线时贵要静脉完全可压缩。当使用一个止血带和两个止血带时,分别有62名和31名参与者的静脉完全可压缩。比较一个止血带和两个止血带的Fisher精确检验显示这两种技术之间没有差异(p = 0.4614)。与两个止血带组相比,在使用血压袖带后,只有两名参与者的静脉仍然完全可压缩,经Fisher精确检验具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。
止血带和血压袖带均可降低外周静脉的可压缩性。虽然一个止血带和两个止血带之间未发现差异,但使用血压袖带可显著降低可压缩性。本研究结果可在急诊科用于尝试获得外周静脉通路时,特别是支持使用血压袖带降低可压缩性。