Okigawa Takashi, Utsunomiya Daisuke, Tajiri Satomi, Okumura Shuichiro, Sasao Akira, Wada Hirohumi, Oda Seitaro, Arimura Hiroki, Hayashida Eri, Urata Joji, Yamashita Yasuyuki
Diagnostic Imaging Center, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital.
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2014;13(1):1-6. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0051. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
Differences in acute adverse reactions to different gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents have not been thoroughly evaluated. We investigated the relationships among the incidence and severity of acute adverse reactions, backgrounds of patients, and 4 types of different Gd-based contrast agents (gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadoteridol, gadoterate meglumine, and gadoxetate disodium).
We retrospectively reviewed the radiological records of 10,595 consecutive patients (4,343 female; 6,252 male; mean age, 63.8 ± 14.0 years) who underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging between August 2006 and March 2011. Adverse reactions were classified as mild, moderate, and severe according to the definition of the American College of Radiology. The incidence of adverse reactions were compared on the basis of clinical characteristics and type, dose, and delivery methods of contrast agents by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
The incidence of overall reactions was 0.45% (48/10,595); 45 reactions were mild and three were moderate. No severe reactions were observed. Although the incidence of adverse reactions did not differ significantly between male and female patients, younger individuals were at higher risk for acute adverse reactions. The contrast injection rate and contrast dose were not significantly related to the incidence of adverse reactions. The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly higher for gadoxetate disodium (0.82%) than gadopentetate dimeglumine (0.43%).
The incidence of acute adverse reactions elicited by Gd-based contrast agents injection was only 0.45%. Younger age was a risk factor for acute reactions. All 4 agents were found to be safe, although gadoxetate disodium showed a relatively higher incidence of adverse reactions.
不同钆(Gd)基造影剂的急性不良反应差异尚未得到充分评估。我们研究了急性不良反应的发生率和严重程度、患者背景以及4种不同Gd基造影剂(钆喷酸葡胺、钆特醇、钆喷酸葡甲胺和钆塞酸二钠)之间的关系。
我们回顾性分析了2006年8月至2011年3月期间连续10595例接受对比增强磁共振成像的患者(4343例女性;6252例男性;平均年龄63.8±14.0岁)的放射学记录。根据美国放射学会的定义,不良反应分为轻度、中度和重度。通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析,根据临床特征以及造影剂的类型、剂量和给药方式比较不良反应的发生率。
总体反应发生率为0.45%(48/10595);45例反应为轻度,3例为中度。未观察到严重反应。虽然男性和女性患者的不良反应发生率无显著差异,但年轻个体发生急性不良反应的风险较高。造影剂注射速率和造影剂剂量与不良反应发生率无显著相关性。钆塞酸二钠的不良反应发生率(0.82%)显著高于钆喷酸葡胺(0.43%)。
注射Gd基造影剂引起的急性不良反应发生率仅为0.45%。年轻是急性反应的一个危险因素。尽管钆塞酸二钠的不良反应发生率相对较高,但发现所有4种造影剂都是安全的。