Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Hematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Am J Hematol. 2014 Jun;89(6):575-80. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23688. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
After first-line therapy, patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and aggressive non-HL are followed up closely for early signs of relapse. The current follow-up practice with frequent use of surveillance imaging is highly controversial and warrants a critical evaluation. Therefore, a retrospective multicenter study of relapsed HL and aggressive non-HL (nodal T-cell and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas) was conducted. All included patients had been diagnosed during the period 2002-2011 and relapsed after achieving complete remission on first-line therapy. Characteristics and outcome of imaging-detected relapses were compared with other relapses. A total of 258 patients with recurrent lymphoma were included in the study. Relapse investigations were initiated outside preplanned visits in 52% of the patients. Relapse detection could be attributed to patient-reported symptoms alone or in combination with abnormal blood tests or physical examination in 64% of the patients. Routine imaging prompted relapse investigations in 27% of the patients. The estimated number of routine scans per relapse was 91-255 depending on the lymphoma subtype. Patients with imaging-detected relapse had lower disease burden (P = 0.045) and reduced risk of death following relapse (hazard ratio = 0.62, P = 0.02 in multivariate analysis). Patient-reported symptoms are still the most common factor for detecting lymphoma relapse and the high number of scans per relapse calls for improved criteria for use of surveillance imaging. However, imaging-detected relapse was associated with lower disease burden and a possible survival advantage. The future role of routine surveillance imaging should be defined in a randomized trial.
在一线治疗后,霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)和侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者密切随访,以早期发现复发迹象。目前,频繁使用监测成像进行的随访实践存在很大争议,需要进行批判性评估。因此,对复发性 HL 和侵袭性 NHL(结外 T 细胞和弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤)进行了回顾性多中心研究。所有纳入的患者均在 2002-2011 年期间确诊,且在一线治疗完全缓解后复发。比较了影像学检测到的复发与其他复发的特征和结果。研究共纳入 258 例复发性淋巴瘤患者。52%的患者在计划外就诊时开始进行复发调查。64%的患者仅因患者报告的症状或与异常血液检查或体检相结合而发现复发。27%的患者常规影像学检查提示复发调查。根据淋巴瘤亚型的不同,每次复发的常规扫描次数估计为 91-255 次。与影像学检测到的复发患者相比,疾病负担较低(P = 0.045),复发后死亡风险降低(多因素分析的危险比=0.62,P = 0.02)。患者报告的症状仍然是检测淋巴瘤复发的最常见因素,而每次复发的扫描次数较高则需要改进监测成像的使用标准。然而,影像学检测到的复发与较低的疾病负担和可能的生存优势相关。常规监测成像的未来作用应在随机试验中确定。