Guyard-Nicodème Muriel, Gerault Eloise, Platteel Marion, Peschard Olivier, Veron Wilfried, Mondon Philippe, Pascal Svinareff, Feuilloley Marc G J
Laboratory of Microbiology Signals and Microenvironment (LMSM), EA 4312, University of Rouen, 55 rue Saint Germain, F-27000, Evreux, France; Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products Unit, Ploufragan/Plouzané Laboratory, ANSES, BP53, F-22440, Ploufragan, France.
J Appl Toxicol. 2015 Jan;35(1):48-58. doi: 10.1002/jat.2986. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
Most animal experiments on cosmetics safety are prohibited and since March 2013, this obligation includes sensitization tests. However, until now there has been no validated alternative in vitro method. In this work, 400 compounds used in the cosmetic industry were selected to cover the greatest diversity of structures, biological activities and sensitizing potential. These molecules were submitted to a series of tests aimed at reproducing essential steps in sensitization and to distinguish between sensitization and irritations, i.e., transcutaneous permeation (factor A), haptenation (factor B), sensitization cytokines production (factor C) and acute toxicity (factor D). The transcutaneous diffusion was measured on human skin explants using Franz cells. Haptenation was tested in solution on human serum albumin. Sensitization cytokine production was investigated by measurement of interleukin-18 release by keratinocytes. Acute toxicity was determined using an 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide(75) cell viability test. As only sufficiently stable, soluble and detectable compounds are usable, 33, 72, 68 and 68 molecules were finally tested on factors A, B, C and D, respectively, and 32 were completely screened by the four factors. The individual correlation of the four factors with the reference in vivo tests was limited but the combination of these factors led to a correlation between in vivo and in vitro assays of 81.2% and the safety of the test (risk of false negative) reached 96.8%. The techniques employed are simple and inexpensive and this model of four tests appears as a promising technique to evaluate in vitro the skin sensitization potential of unknown molecules.
大多数关于化妆品安全性的动物实验都被禁止,自2013年3月起,这项禁令还包括致敏试验。然而,到目前为止,还没有经过验证的体外替代方法。在这项研究中,挑选了化妆品行业中使用的400种化合物,以涵盖最大范围的结构、生物活性和致敏潜力。这些分子接受了一系列测试,旨在重现致敏过程中的关键步骤,并区分致敏和刺激,即经皮渗透(因素A)、半抗原化(因素B)、致敏细胞因子产生(因素C)和急性毒性(因素D)。使用Franz扩散池在人体皮肤外植体上测量经皮扩散。在溶液中对人血清白蛋白进行半抗原化测试。通过测量角质形成细胞释放的白细胞介素-18来研究致敏细胞因子的产生。使用3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐(MTT)细胞活力测试来确定急性毒性。由于只有足够稳定、可溶且可检测的化合物才能使用,最终分别对33、72、68和68种分子进行了因素A、B、C和D的测试,并且有32种分子通过了这四个因素的全面筛选。这四个因素与体内参考测试的个体相关性有限,但这些因素的组合使体内和体外试验之间的相关性达到了81.2%,测试的安全性(假阴性风险)达到了96.8%。所采用的技术简单且成本低廉,这种四项测试的模型似乎是一种很有前景的技术,可用于体外评估未知分子的皮肤致敏潜力。