Rugeles Saúl-Javier, Rueda Juan-David, Díaz Carlos-Eduardo, Rosselli Diego
Department of Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Medical School, Bogotá, Colombia.
Department of Surgery, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Medical School, Bogotá, Colombia ; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Medical School, Bogotá, Colombia.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov;17(6):343-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.123438.
Our aim was to evaluate the impact of hyperproteic hypocaloric enteral feeding on clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, particularly on severity of organic failure measured with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA).
In a double blind clinical trial, 80 critically ill adult patients were randomized to hyperproteic hypocaloric or to isocaloric enteral nutrition; all patients completed follow-up of at least 4 days. Prescribed caloric intake was: Hyperproteic hypocaloric enteral nutrition (15 kcal/kg with 1.7 g/kg of protein) or isocaloric enteral nutrition (25 kcal/kg with 20% of the calories as protein). The main outcome was the differences in delta SOFA at 48 h. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, days on ventilator, hyperglycemic events, and insulin requirements.
There were no differences in SOFA score at baseline (7.5 (standard deviation (SD) 2.9) vs 6.7 (SD 2.5) P = 0.17). The total amount of calories delivered was similarly low in both groups (12 kcal/kg in intervention group vs 14 kcal/kg in controls), but proteic delivery was significantly different (1.4 vs 0.76 g/kg, respectively P ≤ 0.0001). The intervention group showed an improvement in SOFA score at 48 h (delta SOFA 1.7 (SD 1.9) vs 0.7 (SD 2.8) P = 0.04) and less hyperglycemic episodes per day (1.0 (SD 1.3) vs 1.7 (SD 2.5) P = 0.017).
Enteral hyperproteic hypocaloric nutrition therapy could be associated with a decrease in multiple organ failure measured with SOFA score. We also found decreased hyperglycemia and a trend towards less mechanical ventilation days and ICU length of stay.
我们的目的是评估高蛋白低热量肠内营养对重症患者临床结局的影响,特别是对采用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)法测定的器官功能衰竭严重程度的影响。
在一项双盲临床试验中,80例成年重症患者被随机分为高蛋白低热量组或等热量肠内营养组;所有患者均完成了至少4天的随访。规定的热量摄入量为:高蛋白低热量肠内营养(15千卡/千克,蛋白质1.7克/千克)或等热量肠内营养(25千卡/千克,20%的热量为蛋白质)。主要结局是48小时时SOFA评分的变化差异。次要结局包括重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、机械通气天数、高血糖事件和胰岛素需求量。
基线时SOFA评分无差异(7.5(标准差(SD)2.9)对6.7(SD 2.5),P = 0.17)。两组提供的总热量同样较低(干预组为12千卡/千克,对照组为14千卡/千克),但蛋白质摄入量有显著差异(分别为1.4克/千克对0.76克/千克,P≤0.0001)。干预组在48小时时SOFA评分有所改善(SOFA评分变化1.7(SD 1.9)对0.7(SD 2.8),P = 0.04),且每天的高血糖发作次数较少(1.0(SD 1.3)对1.7(SD 2.5),P = 0.017)。
肠内高蛋白低热量营养治疗可能与用SOFA评分衡量的多器官功能衰竭的减轻有关。我们还发现高血糖降低,且机械通气天数和ICU住院时间有减少的趋势。