Suppr超能文献

不同设计的后足减压鞋的足底压力评估。

Assessment of plantar pressure in hindfoot relief shoes of different designs.

作者信息

Hahn Thomas, Carl Hans-Dieter, Jendrissek Andreas, Brem Matthias, Swoboda Bernd, Rummel Philipp, Pauser Johannes

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Rheumatology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014 Jan-Feb;104(1):19-23. doi: 10.7547/0003-0538-104.1.19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although there are several different concepts of hindfoot relief footwear, there are no studies on the extent of pressure reduction to be achieved by this footwear. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the reduction in plantar pressure to be achieved with two different hindfoot relief shoes.

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers performed three trials at a self-selected speed. Peak pressure values in mass-produced shoes (normal gait) were considered as 100% and were compared with measurements in two differently designed hindfoot relief shoes. Foot portions were defined as heel (0%-15% of total insole length), hindfoot (16%-30%), midfoot (31%-60%), and forefoot (61%-100%).

RESULTS

Heel and hindfoot peak pressures were significantly reduced in both shoes compared with normal gait (P < .05), but the extent of peak pressure reduction under the heel and hindfoot varied significantly between the tested shoes. Midfoot peak pressure was not significantly reduced in tested shoes compared with baseline (P > .05) but differed significantly between the two shoes. Forefoot peak pressure was significantly reduced with one of the tested shoes (to a median 73% baseline; P = .004) but not with the other (median, 88% baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

Hindfoot relief shoes leave a considerable amount of peak pressure, predominantly under the hindfoot. The extent of peak pressure reduction for the heel and the hindfoot varies between different hindfoot relief shoes. Depending on the affected foot area, the kind of hindfoot relief shoe should be carefully chosen.

摘要

背景

尽管对于后足减压鞋存在几种不同的概念,但尚无关于这种鞋能实现的压力降低程度的研究。因此,我们试图评估两种不同的后足减压鞋所实现的足底压力降低情况。

方法

10名健康志愿者以自我选择的速度进行三项试验。将量产鞋(正常步态)中的峰值压力值视为100%,并与两种不同设计的后足减压鞋的测量值进行比较。足部区域定义为足跟(占鞋垫总长度的0%-15%)、后足(16%-30%)、中足(31%-60%)和前足(61%-100%)。

结果

与正常步态相比,两种鞋的足跟和后足峰值压力均显著降低(P <.05),但测试鞋之间足跟和后足下的峰值压力降低程度差异显著。与基线相比,测试鞋中的中足峰值压力没有显著降低(P >.05),但两种鞋之间差异显著。其中一种测试鞋的前足峰值压力显著降低(降至基线的中位数73%;P =.004),而另一种则没有(中位数,88%基线)。

结论

后足减压鞋仍会留下相当数量的峰值压力,主要集中在后足下方。不同后足减压鞋的足跟和后足峰值压力降低程度各不相同。应根据受影响的足部区域,谨慎选择后足减压鞋的类型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验