Suppr超能文献

梯瓦制药工业公司诉卫材株式会社:真正的“争议”是什么?

Teva v. Eisai: what's the real "controversy"?

作者信息

Wang Grace Lillian

出版信息

Food Drug Law J. 2011;66(4):631-54, iii.

Abstract

The current system of regulating the multi-billion-dollar pharmaceutical industry via market exclusivity comes from the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, also known as the Hatch-Waxman Act. The statute creates the framework for controlling the entry of generic drugs by a notification and certification system that heavily relies on the "Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations," a publication commonly known as the "Orange Book." Ever since Congress passed the Hatch-Waxman Act and directed FDA to time generic drug entry based on patents, brand name and generic manufacturers alike have come up with innovative strategies to exploit the system. One major concern is the use of the generic exclusivity period to improperly delay further generic entry. After MedImmune and the MMA amendments, the Federal Circuit followed suit and liberalized standing requirements for generic manufacturer plaintiffs in declaratory judgment actions against brand name manufacturers. This article examines the changing role of declaratory judgment actions in challenging patents upon generic entry and the Constitutional constraints, evaluates alternative regulatory schemes to FDA's current system of enforcement, and discusses the effects of increased litigation in the ANDA world.

摘要

当前通过市场独占权来监管价值数十亿美元制药行业的体系源自1984年的《药品价格竞争与专利期限恢复法案》,也被称为《哈奇-沃克斯曼法案》。该法规通过一个通知和认证系统建立了控制仿制药进入的框架,该系统严重依赖于《已批准治疗等效性评估药品》,这一出版物通常被称为《橙皮书》。自国会通过《哈奇-沃克斯曼法案》并指示美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)根据专利确定仿制药进入时间以来,品牌药制造商和仿制药制造商都想出了利用该系统的创新策略。一个主要担忧是利用仿制药独占期不恰当地延迟进一步的仿制药进入。在美迪免疫公司案和《医疗保险现代化法案》修正案之后,联邦巡回上诉法院也采取了同样做法,放宽了仿制药制造商原告在针对品牌药制造商的宣告性判决诉讼中的诉讼资格要求。本文探讨了宣告性判决诉讼在仿制药进入时挑战专利方面不断变化的作用以及宪法限制,评估了替代FDA现行执法体系的监管方案,并讨论了仿制药简化新药申请(ANDA)领域诉讼增加的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验