Scott Bonnie
Emory University, USA.
Food Drug Law J. 2011;66(3):377-404, ii.
Through its premarket regulation of medical devices, FDA aims to secure device safety and effectiveness while allowing for device innovation. However, these competing objectives have proven too difficult to reconcile. Premarket regulations not only impose a substantial burden on device manufacturers, patients, and FDA itself, they also threaten the advancement of new device technologies. This Article provides an in-depth look at the costs of FDA's current regulatory system, and suggests that these costs ultimately outweigh the system's benefits. Therefore, it proposes that the U.S. consider a new approach to device regulation--one that focuses primarily on postmarket surveillance, and allows end-users, such as health care providers and professional medical organizations, to take a more prominent role.
通过对医疗器械的上市前监管,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)旨在确保器械的安全性和有效性,同时促进器械创新。然而,事实证明,这些相互冲突的目标很难协调一致。上市前监管不仅给器械制造商、患者以及FDA自身带来了沉重负担,还对新器械技术的发展构成了威胁。本文深入探讨了FDA现行监管体系的成本,并指出这些成本最终超过了该体系的收益。因此,文章建议美国考虑一种新的器械监管方式——一种主要侧重于上市后监测的方式,并让医疗保健提供者和专业医疗组织等终端用户发挥更突出的作用。