Sniadecki Marcin, Sawicki Sambor, Wojtylak Szymon, Liro Marcin, Wydra Dariusz
Medical University of Gdansk, Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecologic Endocrinology, Gdansk, Poland.
Medical University of Gdansk, Department of Pathology, Gdansk, Poland.
Ginekol Pol. 2014 Jan;85(1):10-3. doi: 10.17772/gp/1683.
Lymph node (LN) micrometastatic disease has come to prominence since ultrastaging was shown to improve the quality of LN procedures in epithelial cancers. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic usefulness of detecting micrometastases in sentinel (SLN) and non-sentinel LNs (nSLN) in cervical cancer
Twelve consecutive patients with cervical cancer stages IA to IIA, classified according to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and divided into two groups: A (7) and B (5), with and without SLN procedure with methylene blue dye, who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymph nodes removal, were recruited for the study. All LNs were evaluated in hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemically (IHC) in ultrastaging with anti-cytokeratin AE1/AE3 antibodies. A detailed analysis was performed with regard to the technical and histopathological aspects of the procedure.
More LNs could be extracted and studied in group A as compared to group B (210 vs. 70, mean 30 vs. 14, respectively p < 0.0005). A total of 13 SLNs were extracted, and the identification rate was 71% (5/7 in group A). One micrometastatic LN was found in each of the groups (16% cases), but the preliminary classification of the advancement stage was changed only in 1 case from the labeled nodes group (group A--from pN0 with HE to pN1 with IHC).
Presence or absence of metastases in SLN(s) should not be sufficient amount of information for a surgeon or an oncologist, who ought to have data about all of the removed lymph nodes (sent to ultrastaging). In order for the surgery to be performed properly it is vital to ensure that SLNs were removed. Assessment of the N status ought to be taken into consideration in the classification according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO).
自从超分期被证明可提高上皮癌淋巴结手术的质量以来,淋巴结微转移疾病已受到关注。本研究的目的是评估检测宫颈癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)和非前哨淋巴结(nSLN)中微转移的可行性和诊断价值。
连续纳入12例国际癌症控制联盟(UICC)分类为IA至IIA期的宫颈癌患者,分为两组:A组(7例)和B组(5例),分别进行了和未进行亚甲蓝染料前哨淋巴结手术,均接受了根治性子宫切除术和淋巴结清扫术。所有淋巴结均进行苏木精-伊红(HE)染色评估,并在超分期中用抗细胞角蛋白AE1/AE3抗体进行免疫组织化学(IHC)检测。对手术的技术和组织病理学方面进行了详细分析。
与B组相比,A组可提取和研究的淋巴结更多(分别为210个和70个,平均分别为30个和14个,p<0.0005)。共提取了13个前哨淋巴结,识别率为71%(A组5/7)。两组各发现1个微转移淋巴结(16%的病例),但仅1例标记淋巴结组(A组)的进展期初步分类从HE染色的pN0变为IHC检测的pN1。
前哨淋巴结有无转移对于外科医生或肿瘤学家来说不应是足够的信息,他们应该掌握所有切除淋巴结(送去超分期)的数据。为了正确进行手术,确保切除前哨淋巴结至关重要。根据国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分类时应考虑N分期的评估。