Suppr超能文献

皮肤科医生对皮肤脓肿的管理。

Management of cutaneous abscesses by dermatologists.

作者信息

Chouake Jason, Krausz Aimee, Adler Brandon L, Cohen Hillel W, Nosanchuk Joshua D, Friedman Adam

出版信息

J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Feb;13(2):119-24.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

There is currently no data detailing the degree to which dermatologists follow CDC/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines in the treatment of abscesses, which recommend that incision and drainage (I+D) as primary therapy for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the management of skin abscesses by dermatologists.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A national email survey of 780 dermatologists was conducted from May-June 2012. Awareness, experience, and preparedness of respondents for abscess treatment, as well as the treatment practices in different clinical scenarios were evaluated. Response rate = 65% (n=510).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

board certified/eligible dermatologists practicing in US. Main practice affiliation: solo (20%), group (33%), university health system/academic (32%), multi-specialty (13%), and other (2%). Main practice setting: urban (49%), suburban (42%), and rural (9%).

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

Practitioner report of: awareness of national guidelines, use of I+D in initial management of uncomplicated abscess found on face, trunk, and extremity on patients age 6 months, 3, 15, 50, and 80 years, and use of antibiotics in the initial management.

RESULTS

99% of respondents were capable of performing I+D in their practice. The IDSA recommends cultures in all patients treated with antibiotic therapy, and does not recommend antibiotics for the treatment of simple abscess. 18% of respondents reported culturing abscesses less than 50% of the time, while 91% incorporated antibiotics into initial treatment. Nearly a quarter (24%) of respondents would choose an initial antibiotic that would not cover Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). For facial abscesses, as the age of the patient increased from infant, respondents were more likely to incorporate I+D into their initial treatment. For abscesses on the trunk and extremities, respondents were less likely to I+D infants and toddlers, compared to adolescents, adults and the elderly.

CONCLUSION

Although most dermatologists were prepared to manage uncomplicated abscesses (98%), this survey identifies gaps in clinical standards of care established by the CDC/IDSA. Identification of these practice gaps may impact physician practice and dermatology residency curricula, and may serve to improve abscess management and antibacterial stewardship in the outpatient setting.

摘要

重要性

目前尚无数据详细说明皮肤科医生在治疗脓肿时遵循美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)/美国感染病学会(IDSA)指南的程度,该指南推荐切开引流(I+D)作为皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)的主要治疗方法。

目的

评估皮肤科医生对皮肤脓肿的管理情况。

设计、设置、参与者:2012年5月至6月对780名皮肤科医生进行了全国性电子邮件调查。评估了受访者对脓肿治疗的知晓情况、经验和准备情况,以及在不同临床场景下的治疗实践。回复率=65%(n=510)。

入选标准

在美国执业的获得委员会认证/符合资格的皮肤科医生。主要执业附属机构:个体执业(20%)、团体执业(33%)、大学卫生系统/学术机构(32%)、多专科执业(13%)和其他(2%)。主要执业地点:城市(49%)、郊区(42%)和农村(9%)。

主要结局和衡量指标

从业者报告:对国家指南的知晓情况、在6个月、3岁、15岁、50岁和80岁患者面部、躯干和四肢发现的单纯性脓肿初始管理中使用I+D的情况,以及初始管理中使用抗生素的情况。

结果

99%的受访者在其执业中能够进行I+D操作。IDSA建议对所有接受抗生素治疗的患者进行培养,并且不建议使用抗生素治疗单纯性脓肿。18%的受访者报告对脓肿进行培养的时间不到50%,而91%的受访者在初始治疗中使用了抗生素。近四分之一(24%)的受访者会选择一种不覆盖耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的初始抗生素。对于面部脓肿,随着患者年龄从婴儿开始增加,受访者更有可能在初始治疗中采用I+D。对于躯干和四肢的脓肿,与青少年、成年人和老年人相比,受访者对婴幼儿进行I+D的可能性较小。

结论

尽管大多数皮肤科医生准备好管理单纯性脓肿(98%),但这项调查发现了CDC/IDSA制定的临床护理标准存在差距。识别这些实践差距可能会影响医生的实践和皮肤科住院医师课程,并且可能有助于改善门诊环境中的脓肿管理和抗菌药物管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验