Goodliffe Laura, Ragan Kelsey, Larocque Michael, Borgundvaag Emily, Khan Sophia, Moore Christine, McCreight Liz, Coleman Brenda L, McGeer Allison J
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;35(3):225-30. doi: 10.1086/675286. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
Identify factors affecting the rate of hand hygiene opportunities in an acute care hospital.
Prospective observational study.
Medical and surgical in-patient units, medical-surgical intensive care unit (MSICU), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and emergency department (ED) of an academic acute care hospital from May to August, 2012.
Healthcare workers.
One-hour patient-based observations measured patient interactions and hand hygiene opportunities as defined by the "Four Moments for Hand Hygiene." Rates of patient interactions and hand hygiene opportunities per patient-hour were calculated, examining variation by room type, healthcare worker type, and time of day.
During 257 hours of observation, 948 healthcare worker-patient interactions and 1,605 hand hygiene opportunities were identified. Moments 1, 2, 3, and 4 comprised 42%, 10%, 9%, and 39% of hand hygiene opportunities. Nurses contributed 77% of opportunities, physicians contributed 8%, other healthcare workers contributed 11%, and housekeeping contributed 4%. The mean rate of hand hygiene opportunities per patient-hour was 4.2 for surgical units, 4.5 for medical units, 5.2 for ED, 10.4 for NICU, and 13.2 for MSICU (P < .001). In non-ICU settings, rates of hand hygiene opportunities decreased over the course of the day. Patients with transmission-based precautions had approximately half as many interactions (rate ratio [RR], 0.55 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.80]) and hand hygiene opportunities per hour (RR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.29-0.77]) as did patients without precautions.
Measuring hand hygiene opportunities across clinical settings lays the groundwork for product use-based hand hygiene measurement. Additional work is needed to assess factors affecting rates in other hospitals and health care settings.
确定影响急症医院手卫生时机发生率的因素。
前瞻性观察研究。
2012年5月至8月间,一所学术性急症医院的内科和外科住院病房、内科-外科重症监护病房(MSICU)、新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)以及急诊科(ED)。
医护人员。
基于患者的1小时观察,测量患者互动情况以及“手卫生的四个时刻”所定义的手卫生时机。计算每名患者每小时的患者互动率和手卫生时机发生率,分析不同病房类型、医护人员类型以及一天中不同时段的差异。
在257小时的观察期间,共识别出948次医护人员与患者的互动以及1605次手卫生时机。时刻1、2、3和4分别占手卫生时机的42%、10%、9%和39%。护士贡献了77%的手卫生时机,医生贡献了8%,其他医护人员贡献了11%,保洁人员贡献了4%。外科病房每名患者每小时的手卫生时机平均发生率为4.2次,内科病房为4.5次急诊室为5.2次,新生儿重症监护病房为10.4次,内科-外科重症监护病房为13.2次(P < 0.001)。在非重症监护病房环境中,手卫生时机发生率在一天中呈下降趋势。采取基于传播的预防措施的患者每小时的互动次数(率比[RR],0.55[95%置信区间(CI),0.37 - 0.80])和手卫生时机次数(RR,0.47[95%CI,0.29 - 0.77])约为未采取预防措施患者的一半。
在不同临床环境中测量手卫生时机为基于产品使用的手卫生测量奠定了基础。需要开展更多工作来评估影响其他医院和医疗环境中发生率的因素。