Raimondi Cristina, Nicolazzo Chiara, Gradilone Angela, Giannini Giuseppe, De Falco Elena, Chimenti Isotta, Varriale Elisa, Hauch Siegfried, Plappert Linda, Cortesi Enrico, Gazzaniga Paola
Dipartimento Medicina Molecolare; Sapienza Università di Roma; Rome, Italy.
Dipartimento di Scienze Medico-Chirurgiche, Sapienza Università di Roma Polo Pontino; Rome, Italy.
Cancer Biol Ther. 2014 May;15(5):496-503. doi: 10.4161/cbt.28020. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
The hypothesis of the "liquid biopsy" using circulating tumor cells (CTCs) emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional tissue biopsy to determine cancer therapy. Discordance for biomarkers expression between primary tumor tissue and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been widely reported, thus rendering the biological characterization of CTCs an attractive tool for biomarkers assessment and treatment selection. Studies performed in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients using CellSearch, the only FDA-cleared test for CTCs assessment, demonstrated a much lower yield of CTCs in this tumor type compared with breast and prostate cancer, both at baseline and during the course of treatment. Thus, although attractive, the possibility to use CTCs as therapy-related biomarker for colorectal cancer patients is still limited by a number of technical issues mainly due to the low sensitivity of the CellSearch method. In the present study we found a significant discordance between CellSearch and AdnaTest in the detection of CTCs from mCRC patients. We then investigated KRAS pathway activating mutations in CTCs and determined the degree of heterogeneity for KRAS oncogenic mutations between CTCs and tumor tissues. Whether KRAS gene amplification may represent an alternative pathway responsible for KRAS activation was further explored. KRAS gene amplification emerged as a functionally equivalent and mutually exclusive mechanism of KRAS pathway activation in CTCs, possibly related to transcriptional activation. The serial assessment of CTCs may represent an early biomarker of treatment response, able to overcome the intrinsic limit of current molecular biomarkers represented by intratumor heterogeneity.
利用循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)进行“液体活检”的假说,作为一种微创替代方法应运而生,以取代传统组织活检来确定癌症治疗方案。原发性肿瘤组织与循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)之间生物标志物表达的不一致已被广泛报道,因此CTC的生物学特性成为生物标志物评估和治疗选择的一个有吸引力的工具。在转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者中使用CellSearch(唯一经美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于CTC评估的检测方法)进行的研究表明,与乳腺癌和前列腺癌相比,这种肿瘤类型在基线期和治疗过程中CTC的检出率要低得多。因此,尽管CTC作为结直肠癌患者治疗相关生物标志物很有吸引力,但由于CellSearch方法灵敏度低等诸多技术问题,其应用可能性仍然有限。在本研究中,我们发现CellSearch与AdnaTest在检测mCRC患者的CTC时存在显著差异。然后,我们研究了CTC中KRAS通路激活突变,并确定了CTC与肿瘤组织之间KRAS致癌突变的异质性程度。进一步探讨了KRAS基因扩增是否可能代表导致KRAS激活的另一种途径。KRAS基因扩增在CTC中作为KRAS通路激活的功能等效且相互排斥的机制出现,可能与转录激活有关。对CTC的连续评估可能代表治疗反应早期生物标志物,能够克服当前分子生物标志物因肿瘤内异质性所代表的内在局限性。