Suppr超能文献

甲状腺结节的粗针活检——诊断效用及疼痛体验评估

Core needle biopsy of thyroid nodules - evaluation of diagnostic utility and pain experience.

作者信息

Stangierski Adam, Wolinski Kosma, Martin Karolina, Leitgeber Olena, Ruchala Marek

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Medical Student at Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2013;34(8):798-801.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A crucial problem in the non-operative diagnosis of thyroid nodules is the significant amount of non-diagnostic biopsies. This is a challenge for practicing endocrinologists especially when the results of the repeated biopsies remain non-diagnostic. The lack of a concrete preoperative diagnosis may result in unnecessary thyroidectomies in patients. Alternatively, it may also lead to the delayed diagnosis of cancer. One method of biopsy specimen acquisition that could potentially increase the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid biopsies is the application of core-needles. The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value and patient tolerability of core-needle aspiration biopsies (CNAB) with fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNAB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included patients with thyroid nodular goiter in whom previous conventional FNAB yielded non-diagnostic results. CNABs were performed using 22G core-needles. The control group consisted of patients undergoing conventional FNAB with 25G fine-needles. Pain during core-needle biopsies of thyroid nodules was assessed using the 10-point visual analog scale.

RESULTS

There were a total of 30 lesions in 26 patients undergoing CNAB (22 women, 4 men, mean age 48.3) and a total of 59 lesions in 40 patients undergoing FNAB (34 women, 6 men, mean age 57.3). 56.6% of CNABs and 50.8% of FNABs were diagnostic (p=0.60). When assessing pain via the visual analog scale, the median score for biopsies performed with core-needles was four. 60.0% of patients considered the pain of core-needle aspiration biopsies to be similar to the pain experienced during the previous conventional fine-needle aspiration biopsies, while 40% of patients claimed that the pain was more intense.

CONCLUSIONS

CNAB did not prove to be superior to FNAB. Despite the larger needle gauge used during core-needle biopsies, the patients' tolerability was comparable to conventional fine-needle biopsies.

摘要

目的

甲状腺结节非手术诊断中的一个关键问题是大量活检结果无法诊断。这对内分泌科医生来说是一项挑战,尤其是当重复活检结果仍无法诊断时。缺乏明确的术前诊断可能导致患者接受不必要的甲状腺切除术。或者,这也可能导致癌症的诊断延迟。一种可能提高甲状腺活检诊断准确性的活检标本采集方法是应用粗针。本研究的目的是比较粗针穿刺活检(CNAB)与细针穿刺活检(FNAB)的诊断价值和患者耐受性。

患者和方法

本研究纳入了甲状腺结节性甲状腺肿患者,这些患者之前的传统FNAB结果无法诊断。使用22G粗针进行CNAB。对照组由接受25G细针传统FNAB的患者组成。使用10分视觉模拟量表评估甲状腺结节粗针活检时的疼痛。

结果

共有26例接受CNAB的患者出现30个病变(22名女性,4名男性,平均年龄48.3岁),40例接受FNAB的患者出现59个病变(34名女性,6名男性,平均年龄57.3岁)。56.6%的CNAB和50.8%的FNAB具有诊断价值(p=0.60)。通过视觉模拟量表评估疼痛时,粗针活检的中位评分为4分。60.0%的患者认为粗针穿刺活检的疼痛与之前传统细针穿刺活检时的疼痛相似,而40%的患者称疼痛更剧烈。

结论

CNAB并不优于FNAB。尽管粗针活检时使用的针径更大,但患者的耐受性与传统细针活检相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验