Suppr超能文献

用于面部和单词识别的事件相关电位(ERP)特征基于它们在语义记忆中的状态,而非其刺激类别。

ERP profiles for face and word recognition are based on their status in semantic memory not their stimulus category.

作者信息

Nie Aiqing, Griffin Michael, Keinath Alexander, Walsh Matthew, Dittmann Andrea, Reder Lynne

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Behavior Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China.

Psychology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2014 Apr 4;1557:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that faces and words are processed and remembered differently as reflected by different ERP patterns for the two types of stimuli. Specifically, face stimuli produced greater late positive deflections for old items in anterior compared to posterior regions, while word stimuli produced greater late positive deflections in posterior compared to anterior regions. Given that words have existing representations in subjects׳ long-term memories (LTM) and that face stimuli used in prior experiments were of unknown individuals, we conducted an ERP study that crossed face and letter stimuli with the presence or absence of a prior (stable or existing) memory representation. During encoding, subjects judged whether stimuli were known (famous face or real word) or not known (unknown person or pseudo-word). A surprise recognition memory test required subjects to distinguish between stimuli that appeared during the encoding phase and stimuli that did not. ERP results were consistent with previous research when comparing unknown faces and words; however, the late ERP pattern for famous faces was more similar to that for words than for unknown faces. This suggests that the critical ERP difference is mediated by whether there is a prior representation in LTM, and not whether the stimulus involves letters or faces.

摘要

先前的研究表明,面孔和单词的处理与记忆方式不同,这两种类型的刺激所产生的不同事件相关电位(ERP)模式反映了这一点。具体而言,与后部区域相比,面孔刺激在旧项目的前部区域产生更大的晚期正波偏移,而单词刺激在后部区域比前部区域产生更大的晚期正波偏移。鉴于单词在受试者的长期记忆(LTM)中有现有的表征,并且先前实验中使用的面孔刺激是未知个体的,我们进行了一项ERP研究,将面孔和字母刺激与先前(稳定或现有的)记忆表征的有无进行交叉。在编码过程中,受试者判断刺激是已知的(名人面孔或真实单词)还是未知的(陌生人或伪单词)。一项意外的识别记忆测试要求受试者区分编码阶段出现的刺激和未出现的刺激。在比较未知面孔和单词时,ERP结果与先前的研究一致;然而,名人面孔的晚期ERP模式与单词的更相似,而不是与未知面孔的相似。这表明关键的ERP差异是由LTM中是否有先前的表征介导的,而不是由刺激是涉及字母还是面孔介导的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验