Suppr超能文献

抗双链DNA抗体作为系统性红斑狼疮的分类标准和诊断标志物:批判性评论。

Anti-dsDNA antibodies as a classification criterion and a diagnostic marker for systemic lupus erythematosus: critical remarks.

作者信息

Rekvig O P

机构信息

RNA and Molecular Pathology Research Group, Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Clin Exp Immunol. 2015 Jan;179(1):5-10. doi: 10.1111/cei.12296.

Abstract

Antibodies to mammalian dsDNA have, for decades, been linked to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and particularly to its most serious complication, lupus nephritis. This canonical view derives from studies on its strong association with disease. The dogma was particularly settled when the antibody was included in the classification criteria for SLE that developed during the 1970s, most prominently in the 1982 American College of Rheumatology (ACR), and recently in The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria. There are several problems to be discussed before the anti-dsDNA antibody can be accepted without further distinction as a criterion to classify SLE. Old and contemporary knowledge make it clear that an anti-dsDNA antibody is not a unifying term. It embraces antibodies with a wide spectrum of fine molecular specificities, antibodies that are produced transiently in context of infections and persistently in the context of true autoimmunity, and also includes anti-dsDNA antibodies that have the potential to bind chromatin (accessible DNA structures) and not (specificity for DNA structures that are embedded in chromatin and therefore unaccessible for the antibodies). This critical review summarizes this knowledge and questions whether or not an anti-dsDNA antibody, as simply that, can be used to classify SLE.

摘要

几十年来,针对哺乳动物双链DNA的抗体一直与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)相关联,尤其是与其最严重的并发症狼疮性肾炎相关。这一传统观点源于对其与疾病的强烈关联的研究。当该抗体被纳入20世纪70年代制定的SLE分类标准中时,这一教条尤其得到确立,最显著的是在1982年美国风湿病学会(ACR)的标准中,以及最近在国际系统性红斑狼疮协作诊所(SLICC)的分类标准中。在将抗双链DNA抗体不加进一步区分地作为SLE分类标准接受之前,有几个问题需要讨论。过去和当代的知识都清楚地表明,抗双链DNA抗体不是一个统一的术语。它包含具有广泛精细分子特异性的抗体,在感染情况下短暂产生且在真正的自身免疫情况下持续存在的抗体,还包括有可能结合染色质(可及的DNA结构)的抗双链DNA抗体以及不结合(对嵌入染色质中因而抗体无法触及的DNA结构具有特异性)的抗双链DNA抗体。这篇批判性综述总结了这些知识,并质疑仅仅作为抗双链DNA抗体能否用于SLE的分类。

相似文献

2
Autoimmunity and SLE: Factual and Semantic Evidence-Based Critical Analyses of Definitions, Etiology, and Pathogenesis.
Front Immunol. 2020 Oct 6;11:569234. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.569234. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of treatment control in severe chronic urticaria treated with omalizumab.
Asia Pac Allergy. 2025 Sep;15(3):159-165. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.0000000000000162. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Autoantibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Diagnostic and Pathogenic Insights.
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 12;14(16):5714. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165714.
8
SLE: a cognitive step forward-a synthesis of rethinking theories, causality, and ignored DNA structures.
Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 4;15:1393814. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1393814. eCollection 2024.
9
A Conditionally Activated Cytosol-Penetrating Antibody for TME-Dependent Intracellular Cargo Delivery.
Antibodies (Basel). 2024 May 2;13(2):37. doi: 10.3390/antib13020037.

本文引用的文献

3
The role of defective clearance of apoptotic cells in systemic autoimmunity.
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010 May;6(5):280-9. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.46.
5
Treatment with a laminin-derived peptide suppresses lupus nephritis.
J Immunol. 2005 Oct 15;175(8):5516-23. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.8.5516.
7
A viral DNA-binding domain elicits anti-DNA antibodies of different specificities.
Mol Immunol. 2005 Feb;42(3):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.09.003.
9
The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core.
Nature. 2003 May 8;423(6936):145-50. doi: 10.1038/nature01595.
10
Autoimmunity to nucleosomes related to viral infection: a focus on hapten-carrier complex formation.
J Autoimmun. 2003 Mar;20(2):171-82. doi: 10.1016/s0896-8411(02)00110-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验