Rekvig O P
RNA and Molecular Pathology Research Group, Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2015 Jan;179(1):5-10. doi: 10.1111/cei.12296.
Antibodies to mammalian dsDNA have, for decades, been linked to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and particularly to its most serious complication, lupus nephritis. This canonical view derives from studies on its strong association with disease. The dogma was particularly settled when the antibody was included in the classification criteria for SLE that developed during the 1970s, most prominently in the 1982 American College of Rheumatology (ACR), and recently in The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria. There are several problems to be discussed before the anti-dsDNA antibody can be accepted without further distinction as a criterion to classify SLE. Old and contemporary knowledge make it clear that an anti-dsDNA antibody is not a unifying term. It embraces antibodies with a wide spectrum of fine molecular specificities, antibodies that are produced transiently in context of infections and persistently in the context of true autoimmunity, and also includes anti-dsDNA antibodies that have the potential to bind chromatin (accessible DNA structures) and not (specificity for DNA structures that are embedded in chromatin and therefore unaccessible for the antibodies). This critical review summarizes this knowledge and questions whether or not an anti-dsDNA antibody, as simply that, can be used to classify SLE.
几十年来,针对哺乳动物双链DNA的抗体一直与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)相关联,尤其是与其最严重的并发症狼疮性肾炎相关。这一传统观点源于对其与疾病的强烈关联的研究。当该抗体被纳入20世纪70年代制定的SLE分类标准中时,这一教条尤其得到确立,最显著的是在1982年美国风湿病学会(ACR)的标准中,以及最近在国际系统性红斑狼疮协作诊所(SLICC)的分类标准中。在将抗双链DNA抗体不加进一步区分地作为SLE分类标准接受之前,有几个问题需要讨论。过去和当代的知识都清楚地表明,抗双链DNA抗体不是一个统一的术语。它包含具有广泛精细分子特异性的抗体,在感染情况下短暂产生且在真正的自身免疫情况下持续存在的抗体,还包括有可能结合染色质(可及的DNA结构)的抗双链DNA抗体以及不结合(对嵌入染色质中因而抗体无法触及的DNA结构具有特异性)的抗双链DNA抗体。这篇批判性综述总结了这些知识,并质疑仅仅作为抗双链DNA抗体能否用于SLE的分类。