Dr. Sajid Rashid, BSPT, PP-DPT, HOD, Physiotherapy Department, The Children's Hospital & the Institute of Child Health Multan, Multan, Pakistan.
Prof. Dr. Kamran Salick, MD(USA), FCPS, Professor, Orthopedic Department, Nishtar Medical College & Hospital, Multan, Pakistan.
Pak J Med Sci. 2013 Nov;29(6):1406-9. doi: 10.12669/pjms.296.4127.
Mobilization techniques are frequently used by physiotherapists to reduce pain, improve joint movement and facilitate return to activities after injury. The objective of this study was to explore differences in the efficacy of Mobilization Techniques in Post-Traumatic stiff ankle with and without Paraffin Wax Bath.
Thirty seven patients of Post Traumatic stiff ankle were recruited for the study at Sajid Physiotherapy & Rehabilitation center, Multan from March 2011 to February 2013. It was a randomized controlled trial and the patients with equal grades of severity were placed in control and study groups. Group A had nineteen patients and Group B had 18 patients. The inclusion criteria were age range from 20-60 years, pain, loss of ROM, with history of trauma and fracture of ankle. The patients with similar complaints but with surgical treatment were excluded. Group A was given mobilization techniques with paraffin wax bath while group B was treated without paraffin wax bath. Improvement was observed by EscolaPaulista de Medicina Range of Motion (EPM-ROM) scale and visual analogue scale (VAS). After ten weeks of treatment, the patients were re-evaluated by an orthopedic surgeon and a Physiotherapist for their symptoms and ROM. t-test was applied to compare outcome between two groups and p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Group A had nineteen patients and Group B had 18 patients and both were treated for ten weeks. There were 12 male and 7 female patients in group A and 10 male and 8 female in group B. At the start of treatment the basic characteristic were similar in both the groups. Deficits in dorsiflexion, planterflexion, inversion, eversion pain and stiffness were measured before and after the treatment period. Pain relief was found better in both groups which were considered statistically significant with p=0.001, group A (1.135 ± 0.359) vs. group B (1.135 ± 0.359). ROM in pre and post treatment degrees showed that dorsiflexion was significantly increased in group A (1.135 ± 0.359) vs. group B (1.135 ± 0.0359).) and planterflexion was in group A (1.337 ± 0.422) vs. group B (0.841 ± 0.264). Functional movement showed improvement in inversion in group A (0.875 ± 0.276) vs. group B (0.966 ± 0.305) and in eversion in group A (0.948 ± 0.300) vs. group B (0.674 ± 0.213). Mobilization Techniques followed by wax bath resulted in significant improvements of range of motion (ROM), clinical and functional changes. Wax bath alone had no significant effect. After ten weeks intervention treatment, t-test was applied to compare outcome between the two groups and p=0.001to 0.004 in group A and p= 0.104 to 0.168 in group B, (p<0.05) was obtained which shows statistical significance.
Joint mobilization and wax bath therapy is an effective and beneficial tool to improve the symptoms and quality of life in post traumatic stiff ankle patients. Joint mobilization techniques combined with wax bath are more effective in the management of post-traumatic stiff ankle as compared to wax therapy alone.
物理治疗师经常使用松动技术来减轻疼痛、改善关节运动,并促进受伤后活动的恢复。本研究的目的是探讨在创伤后僵硬踝关节中,松动技术与石蜡浴联合应用与单独应用的疗效差异。
2011 年 3 月至 2013 年 2 月,在木尔坦的萨吉德物理治疗与康复中心招募了 37 名创伤后僵硬踝关节患者参加本研究。这是一项随机对照试验,将严重程度相等的患者分为对照组和研究组。A 组有 19 名患者,B 组有 18 名患者。纳入标准为年龄在 20-60 岁之间,有疼痛、活动范围受限、有创伤和踝关节骨折病史。排除具有类似症状但接受手术治疗的患者。A 组接受松动技术加石蜡浴治疗,B 组则不进行石蜡浴治疗。采用 EscolaPaulista de Medicina 活动范围(EPM-ROM)量表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)观察改善情况。治疗 10 周后,由骨科医生和物理治疗师对患者的症状和活动范围进行再次评估。应用 t 检验比较两组之间的结果,p<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
A 组有 19 名患者,B 组有 18 名患者,均接受了 10 周的治疗。A 组中有 12 名男性和 7 名女性患者,B 组中有 10 名男性和 8 名女性患者。在治疗开始时,两组的基本特征相似。治疗前后测量背屈、跖屈、内翻、外翻、疼痛和僵硬程度。两组的疼痛缓解均被认为具有统计学意义(p=0.001),A 组(1.135±0.359)vs. B 组(1.135±0.359)。治疗前后活动度的测量显示,A 组的背屈度显著增加(1.135±0.359)vs. B 组(1.135±0.0359)。跖屈度在 A 组(1.337±0.422)vs. B 组(0.841±0.264)中也有所增加。功能运动方面,A 组的内翻度(0.875±0.276)vs. B 组(0.966±0.305)和外翻度(0.948±0.300)vs. B 组(0.674±0.213)均有改善。松动技术联合石蜡浴治疗可显著改善活动范围(ROM)、临床和功能变化。单独使用石蜡浴则没有显著效果。在 10 周的干预治疗后,应用 t 检验比较两组之间的结果,A 组的 p 值为 0.001 至 0.004,B 组的 p 值为 0.104 至 0.168,均具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。
关节松动和石蜡浴治疗是改善创伤后僵硬踝关节患者症状和生活质量的有效工具。与单独使用石蜡浴治疗相比,关节松动技术联合石蜡浴治疗在创伤后僵硬踝关节的管理中更为有效。