Suppr超能文献

微创治疗移位性关节内跟骨骨折:纵行入路与跗骨窦入路的比较

Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated in a minimally invasive fashion: longitudinal approach versus sinus tarsi approach.

作者信息

Zhang Tao, Su Yanling, Chen Wei, Zhang Qi, Wu Zhanpo, Zhang Yingze

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, Republic of China. E-mail address for T. Zhang:

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19;96(4):302-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01215.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus remains controversial. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of a minimally invasive longitudinal approach compared with the sinus tarsi approach in the surgical treatment of these fractures.

METHODS

Patients with a displaced intra-articular fracture of the calcaneus who were admitted to the trauma center of our hospital from September 2009 through April 2010 were randomly assigned to treatment using one of these two surgical techniques. All patients underwent the same standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocol. Functional outcome was assessed by using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scores. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify the potential influencing factors for functional outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-seven patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Thirty-seven patients were lost to follow-up for various reasons, and the remaining 130 patients were followed for an average of twenty-seven months. Sixty-nine fractures in sixty-three patients were treated using a minimally invasive longitudinal approach (the MILA group), and seventy-two feet in sixty-seven patients were treated with a sinus tarsi approach (the STA group). The two groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, fracture type, and time from injury to operation. The operative time in the MILA group was significantly shorter than that in STA group (p < 0.05). Wound-healing complications were 2.9% in the MILA group and 12.5% in the STA group. The average time to the start of progressive weight-bearing exercise was 5.3 weeks in the MILA group and 5.6 weeks in the STA group (p > 0.05). The good and excellent results in the two groups were comparable for the Sanders type-II and III calcaneal fractures (p > 0.05), but the good to excellent rate in the STA group was significantly higher for the Sanders type-IV fractures (p < 0.05). Linear regression analysis showed that surgical technique, Sanders classification, and the time to the start of weight-bearing activity have a significant influence on functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes are similar for the minimally invasive longitudinal and sinus tarsi surgical approaches in the treatment of Sanders type-II and III displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus, with the benefit of a lower complication rate and shorter operative time for the minimally invasive technique. For Sanders type-IV fractures, however, the sinus tarsi approach appears to be the treatment of choice.

摘要

背景

跟骨关节内移位骨折的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估在手术治疗这些骨折时,与跗骨窦入路相比,微创纵向入路的临床疗效。

方法

选取2009年9月至2010年4月在我院创伤中心住院的跟骨关节内移位骨折患者,随机分配接受这两种手术技术之一进行治疗。所有患者均接受相同的标准化术后康复方案。采用美国矫形足踝协会评分评估功能结局。进行线性回归分析以确定功能结局的潜在影响因素。

结果

167例符合纳入标准的患者纳入本研究。37例患者因各种原因失访,其余130例患者平均随访27个月。63例患者的69处骨折采用微创纵向入路治疗(微创纵向入路组),67例患者的72足采用跗骨窦入路治疗(跗骨窦入路组)。两组在年龄、性别、骨折类型和受伤至手术时间方面具有可比性。微创纵向入路组的手术时间明显短于跗骨窦入路组(p<0.05)。微创纵向入路组的伤口愈合并发症发生率为2.9%,跗骨窦入路组为12.5%。微创纵向入路组开始渐进性负重锻炼的平均时间为5.3周,跗骨窦入路组为5.6周(p>0.05)。对于Sanders II型和III型跟骨骨折,两组的优良结果具有可比性(p>0.05),但对于Sanders IV型骨折,跗骨窦入路组的优良率明显更高(p<0.05)。线性回归分析表明,手术技术、Sanders分类和开始负重活动的时间对功能结局有显著影响。

结论

在治疗Sanders II型和III型跟骨关节内移位骨折时,微创纵向入路和跗骨窦手术入路的疗效相似,微创技术具有并发症发生率较低和手术时间较短的优势。然而,对于Sanders IV型骨折,跗骨窦入路似乎是首选治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验