a Department of Psychology , University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(2):280-90. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.873981. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
The recently proposed Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project has the potential to stimulate new research and overcome many of the limitations of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders taxonomy. In the present article we focus, in three main sections, on how theory and research from developmental psychopathology can inform RDoC. First, we discuss the ontology of mental illness and the potential advantages of the RDoC approach to understanding the nature of mental illness. Second, we note potential issues to consider when implementing the RDoC framework, including (a) integrating developmental processes, (b) classifying mental illness within a dimensional approach, and (c) avoiding problems associated with biological reductionism. Third, we describe how a developmental psychopathology perspective may inform each of these potential issues within RDoC. Finally, we highlight the study of emotion and the centrality of affective processes within the RDoC framework. Specifically, we describe how constructionist models of emotion are consistent with developmental psychopathology and how this perspective on emotion can help to guide RDoC research.
最近提出的研究领域标准(RDoC)项目有可能激发新的研究,并克服精神障碍诊断与统计手册分类法的许多局限性。在本文中,我们主要分三个部分讨论发展心理病理学的理论和研究如何为 RDoC 提供信息。首先,我们讨论精神疾病的本体论以及 RDoC 方法理解精神疾病本质的潜在优势。其次,我们注意到在实施 RDoC 框架时需要考虑的潜在问题,包括 (a) 整合发展过程,(b) 在维度方法中对精神疾病进行分类,以及 (c) 避免与生物还原论相关的问题。第三,我们描述了发展心理病理学观点如何为 RDoC 中的这些潜在问题提供信息。最后,我们强调了情绪研究以及情感过程在 RDoC 框架中的核心地位。具体来说,我们描述了情绪的建构主义模型如何与发展心理病理学一致,以及这种情绪观点如何帮助指导 RDoC 研究。