Gill Paul, Lowes Lesley
Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd CF37 1DL, UK.
School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, 35-43 Newport Road, Cardiff CF24 0AB, UK.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Sep;51(9):1271-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.01.012. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
Renal transplant failure has a devastating impact on patients and their families. However, little research has been conducted in this area, which limits insight and understanding of the transplant failure experience that could subsequently inform clinical practice.
To explore participants' experiences of renal transplant failure in the first year post-graft failure.
A qualitative, longitudinal study informed by Heideggerian hermeneutics.
A purposive sample of 16 participants (8 recipients, 8 'significant others') from a regional renal transplant unit and 3 District General Hospitals in South-West England.
Data were collected through a series of three recorded, semi-structured interviews in the first year post-renal transplant failure. Data analysis was informed by a three-step analytical process.
Renal transplantation was the treatment of choice and had a transformative effect on the lives of all participants. Graft failure has 2 distinct phases; failing and failed and the transition from one phase to the other is unpredictable, uncertain and stressful. Transplant failure had a devastating impact on all participants, regardless of time since transplantation and resulted in feelings of shock, grief, loss, anger, guilt and depression. Dialysis was disruptive and demanding and served as a constant reminder of transplant failure and lost freedom. Participants grieved the loss of their 'previous life' and 'imagined future' but, beyond the understanding of close family members, these losses appeared unrecognised, particularly by health professionals. Participants used various coping mechanisms to deal with stressors associated with transplant failure. Factors affecting coping and adjusting included improved physical health and social support, which was especially important within the marital dyad. Healthcare services were positively evaluated, although information concerning the prospect of transplant failure and support post-graft failure could be improved.
Renal transplant failure has a profound impact on recipients, spouses and other close family members and appears to resemble a form of disenfranchised grief. The theory of disenfranchised grief provides a coherent explication of participants' experiences in this study, which should help inform clinical practice, particularly in relation to the provision of information and emotional support post-graft failure.
肾移植失败对患者及其家庭有着毁灭性的影响。然而,该领域的研究较少,这限制了对移植失败经历的洞察和理解,而这些理解本可用于指导临床实践。
探讨参与者在移植失败后第一年的肾移植失败经历。
一项基于海德格尔诠释学的定性纵向研究。
从英格兰西南部的一个地区肾移植单位和3家区综合医院中选取了16名参与者(8名接受者,8名“重要他人”)作为目的抽样样本。
在肾移植失败后的第一年,通过一系列三次有记录的半结构化访谈收集数据。数据分析采用三步分析过程。
肾移植是首选治疗方法,对所有参与者的生活都产生了变革性影响。移植失败有两个不同阶段:逐渐失败和已失败,从一个阶段过渡到另一个阶段是不可预测、不确定且充满压力的。移植失败对所有参与者都产生了毁灭性影响,无论移植后时间长短,都会导致震惊、悲伤、失落、愤怒、内疚和抑郁等情绪。透析具有干扰性且要求苛刻,不断提醒着移植失败和失去的自由。参与者为失去“以前的生活”和“想象中的未来”而悲伤,但除了亲密家庭成员能理解外,这些损失似乎未得到认可,尤其是医护人员。参与者采用各种应对机制来应对与移植失败相关的压力源。影响应对和调整的因素包括身体健康状况改善和社会支持,在婚姻关系中社会支持尤为重要。尽管关于移植失败前景和移植后支持的信息可以改进,但对医疗服务的评价是积极的。
肾移植失败对接受者、配偶及其他亲密家庭成员有深远影响,似乎类似于一种不被认可的悲伤形式。不被认可的悲伤理论为该研究中参与者的经历提供了连贯的解释,这应有助于指导临床实践,特别是在移植失败后提供信息和情感支持方面。