Suppr超能文献

非骨水泥型反式全肩关节置换术的临床和影像学结果:2 至 5 年随访的对比研究。

Clinical and radiographic results of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative study with 2 to 5 years of follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Aug;23(8):1208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.032. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most studies of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) involve cemented humeral stems. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the results of cementless RTSA, using a porous-coated stem designed for uncemented fixation, with cemented RTSA.

METHODS

A prospective database of patients undergoing RTSA was retrospectively reviewed for patients with a diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy or severe rotator cuff deficiency with minimum 2-year follow-up. Of these, 37 patients had cemented RTSA and 64 patients had cementless RTSA. Outcome measures included Constant-Murley scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, visual analog pain scale scores, range of motion, patient satisfaction, and radiographic evidence of complication.

RESULTS

Compared with preoperative values, both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements (P < .01) in all functional scores, active forward elevation, and active internal rotation. There was no significant difference (P > .05) in comparing the changes in these values after surgery between the cemented and cementless cohorts. On radiographic evaluation, there was no evidence of loosening or humeral components "at risk" of loosening in either group. There was no significant difference (P = 1.0) in the incidence of humeral component radiolucent lines between the cemented and uncemented cohorts. There was no significant difference (P = .30) in the incidence of scapular notching between the cemented (n = 8) and uncemented (n = 10) cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Cementless fixation of a porous-coated RTSA humeral stem provides clinical and radiographic outcomes equivalent to those of cemented stems at minimum 2-year follow-up. With advantages such as simplified operative technique, no cement-related complications, greater ease of revision, and long-lasting biologic fixation, uncemented fixation may provide several benefits over cemented fixation.

摘要

背景

大多数关于反式全肩关节置换术(RTSA)的研究都涉及骨水泥固定的肱骨柄。据我们所知,这是第一项比较使用专为非骨水泥固定设计的多孔涂层柄的非骨水泥 RTSA 与骨水泥 RTSA 结果的研究。

方法

对接受 RTSA 的患者前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析,纳入诊断为肩袖撕裂性关节炎或严重肩袖缺损的患者,随访时间至少 2 年。其中,37 例患者接受了骨水泥 RTSA,64 例患者接受了非骨水泥 RTSA。评估指标包括Constant-Murley 评分、美国肩肘外科医生评分、视觉模拟疼痛评分、活动范围、患者满意度和影像学并发症证据。

结果

与术前相比,两组患者所有功能评分、主动前向抬高和主动内旋均有显著改善(P<.01)。两组患者术后这些值的变化无显著差异(P>.05)。影像学评估显示,两组均无骨水泥松动或肱骨组件松动的迹象。两组骨水泥固定和非骨水泥固定的肱骨组件透亮线发生率无显著差异(P=1.0)。骨水泥固定组(n=8)和非骨水泥固定组(n=10)的肩胛切迹发生率无显著差异(P=.30)。

结论

多孔涂层 RTSA 肱骨柄的非骨水泥固定在至少 2 年的随访中提供了与骨水泥固定相同的临床和影像学结果。非骨水泥固定具有简化手术技术、无骨水泥相关并发症、更容易进行翻修以及长期生物固定等优势,可能比骨水泥固定具有更多优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验