From *QURE Healthcare, San Rafael, CA; †Faculty of Medicine, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines; ‡Oregon State University, Corvalis, OR; §Crescendo Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA; ∥School of Economics, University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines; and ¶Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
J Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Mar;20(2):79-86. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000076.
Variability in treatment is linked to lower quality of care and higher costs. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease for which care and management may vary considerably among rheumatologists. The extent of this variability and its cost ramifications have not been widely studied. This prospective study evaluated the quality and variability in care and quantified the potential cost implications.
We used Clinical Performance and Value® vignettes to measure the quality of RA care among community-based rheumatologists. Three online Clinical Performance and Value® vignettes--representing patients likely seen in practice with mild disease activity (case A), worsening disease activity (case B), and stable disease with a complicating comorbidity (case C)--were administered to each rheumatologist. Responses were scored against evidence-based criteria. Costs were computed using current (2011) Medicare pricing. Data were analyzed using t test and fixed-effects analysis of variance.
One hundred eight board-certified rheumatologists (72% were male; mean age, 49.1 years) completed the study. Overall quality scores averaged 61.3%. Those employed by a health system or in a multispecialty practice were more likely to score higher. Highest combined scores for diagnosis and treatment were evident with case A (61.7%) and lowest with case C (46.7%). Up to 79% of rheumatologists ordered at least 1 laboratory test that was considered unnecessary by study protocol criteria, incurring a mean excess cost of $37.85 per physician per case. Up to 26.9% rheumatologists prescribed biologic agents that were not indicated based on American College of Rheumatology treatment guidelines, resulting in additional costs of $2041 per patient per month.
In this study, we observed a wide range of reported practice variability by rheumatologists in the management of RA. This included unnecessary testing and use of biologic agents that increased the costs of treatment. Opportunities for quality improvement and cost control exist in the management of RA.
治疗的变异性与护理质量下降和成本增加有关。类风湿关节炎(RA)是一种慢性炎症性疾病,其护理和管理可能在风湿病医生之间存在较大差异。这种变异性的程度及其成本影响尚未得到广泛研究。本前瞻性研究评估了 RA 护理的质量和变异性,并量化了潜在的成本影响。
我们使用临床绩效和价值®病例来衡量社区风湿病医生的 RA 护理质量。向每位风湿病医生提供了三个在线临床绩效和价值®病例-代表在实践中可能遇到的轻度疾病活动(病例 A)、疾病活动恶化(病例 B)和稳定疾病伴并发症(病例 C)的患者。根据循证标准对反应进行评分。使用当前(2011 年)医疗保险定价计算成本。使用 t 检验和固定效应方差分析进行数据分析。
108 名经过董事会认证的风湿病医生(72%为男性;平均年龄为 49.1 岁)完成了研究。总体质量评分平均为 61.3%。受雇于医疗系统或多专业实践的医生更有可能获得更高的分数。在病例 A(61.7%)中,诊断和治疗的综合评分最高,而在病例 C(46.7%)中则最低。多达 79%的风湿病医生至少开了一项被研究方案标准认为是不必要的实验室检查,每位医生每个病例的平均额外费用为 37.85 美元。多达 26.9%的风湿病医生根据美国风湿病学会治疗指南开出了不必要的生物制剂,导致每位患者每月额外费用为 2041 美元。
在这项研究中,我们观察到风湿病医生在管理 RA 方面的实践变异性范围很广。这包括不必要的检查和使用生物制剂,增加了治疗成本。在 RA 的管理中存在质量改进和成本控制的机会。